User talk:The king VIC

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, The king VIC! Thank you for your contributions. I am DRAGON BOOSTER and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 18:28, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The king VIC, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi The king VIC! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Personel

A tag has been placed on Template:Personel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 17:59, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Aishwarya Rai, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 17:59, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2.0 (film). General Ization ^Talk 18:00, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 5 albert square (talk) 20:58, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Moving without discussion

I noticed you moved the Aishwarya page but I've reverted it because it is controversial and undiscussed. If you want to move it to a new title, start a move discussion. KingAndGod 09:48, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Aishwarya Rai, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. KingAndGod 10:17, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

It is obvious that you are Geocraze (talk · contribs) evading your block. This is not the way to do things, you've got to request an unblock on your original account. I'll block this account soon enough, unless there's a credible explanation from you. —SpacemanSpiff 16:06, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The king VIC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

blocked me for no reason The king VIC (talk) 16:44, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is incorrect, your block message does in fact contain a reason. Yamla (talk) 17:04, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism, as you did at Jennifer Winget.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:32, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]