Jump to content

User talk:The kimchi with no name

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, The kimchi with no name, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Epicgenius(give him tiradecheck out damage) 21:11, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Queen Seondeok of Silla may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • the Korean language uses the term "female king" for the position referred to as "queen regnant]]" in English.</ref> of [[Silla]], one of the [[Three Kingdoms of Korea]], from 632 to 647.<ref>[[Il-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:20, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Een Bloemhof) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Een Bloemhof, The kimchi with no name!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Looks great - interesting article. I've looked round Google Books and added two more citations viewable online - hope that's OK.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thank you

Just to check, I notice you removed the references I added. Is there something wrong with them? I can put them back for you if that was a mistake. All the best. Blythwood (talk) 07:10, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The influence of Spinoza is important, and I thank you for including it in the article. However, the references were in a format that is different from the other ones in the article. It's mentioned in all three of the sources already in the article, so I thought it would be easier to cite those sources rather than changing the formatting of the citations.
OK. The citations I've posted are in the full-format, filled in using the ISBN from Google Books. In general, having a range of citations is better, especially since with a Google Books link these are accessible, for example (looking at your contributions) to DYK article reviewers, so I think it would be better if they were put back (which I've done). Having online sources is nice if possible so someone reviewing the article (like me, say) can easily check if the content is correct. All the best. Blythwood (talk) 07:32, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Een Bloemhof

[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]