User talk:The creeper2007/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions with User:The creeper2007. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Stub tags
Please take care not to add {{stub}} to an article like DAFNE which already has a specific stub tag, and remember that all stub tags go at the end not the top, see WP:ORDER. Thanks. PamD 04:30, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
"Wikiclinic" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikiclinic. Since you had some involvement with the Wikiclinic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. ComplexRational (talk) 00:31, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Counter-vandalism
Hello. I saw your question on the Teahouse. You may be interested in WP:CVUA, which covers this and more. Hillelfrei talk 21:00, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you! I have just request CVUA training from Puddleglum2.0.
Hi, you undid an edit I performed, claiming I hadn't adequately explained why, despite my explanation of the edit in the edit summary. It's ok, another editor has already reverted your change. Just wanted you to know in case it was an errant bot or something automated that was malfunctioning. Peace. 75.170.229.227 (talk) 22:59, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- @75.170.229.227: Hello there, I would like to apologize for that. I didn't notice that you have provided an edit summary. Sorry! In addition, I will also pull the warning from your talk page.(and no, I'm not a bot :)) The creeper2007Talk! 23:02, 31 May 2020 (UTC) Edited on 23:03, 31 May 2020 (UTC) 23:20, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
my own test message on my own talk page
hello there
Your thread has been archived
Hi The creeper2007! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
Anarchyte (talk • work) 16:30, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
Hi The creeper2007! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Your thread has been archived
Hi The creeper2007! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi The creeper2007! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 21:18, Thursday, June 18, 2020 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Your thread has been archived
Hi The creeper2007! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
test
test
Your Message Title
Your message here. The creeper2007Talk! 23:37, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
Mz7 (talk) 06:45, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 June 2020
- News and notes: Progress at Wikipedia Library and Wikijournal of Medicine
- Community view: Community open letter on renaming
- Gallery: After the killing of George Floyd
- In the media: Part collaboration and part combat
- Discussion report: Community reacts to WMF rebranding proposals
- Featured content: Sports are returning, with a rainbow
- Arbitration report: Anti-harassment RfC and a checkuser revocation
- Traffic report: The pandemic, alleged murder, a massacre, and other deaths
- News from the WMF: We stand for racial justice
- Recent research: Wikipedia and COVID-19; automated Wikipedia-based fact-checking
- Humour: Cherchez une femme
- On the bright side: For what are you grateful this month?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Black Lives Matter
WikiLoop Battlefield new name vote
Dear The creeper2007,
Thank you for your interest and contributions to WikiLoop Battlefield. We are holding a voting for proposed new name. We would like to invite you to this voting. The voting is held at m:WikiProject_WikiLoop/New_name_vote and ends on July 13th 00:00 UTC.
xinbenlv Talk, Remember to "ping" me 05:07, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2020).
- A request for comment is in progress to remove the T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) speedy deletion criterion.
- Protection templates on mainspace pages are now automatically added by User:MusikBot II (BRFA).
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
RfC regarding on-wiki harassment
. The RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC and is open to comments from the community. - The Medicine case was closed, with a remedy authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for
all discussions about pharmaceutical drug prices and pricing and for edits adding, changing, or removing pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing from articles
.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
Question
Why is removing long-standing unsourced text ([such as in this case) considered bad faith editing and/or vandalism, risking the punishment of a block, as opposed to a plethora of other cases where it does not constitute a problem? Please clarify so I can avoid making such mistakes in the future. Thanks. 2604:2000:EFC0:12:7922:1B66:98F2:E6E1 (talk) 20:18, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, I didn't see the date that is in 2016. Feel free to revert it The creeper2007Talk! 01:40, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Just a little thing about your signature
Hey there. Unless you changed it recently, the code of your signature is:
<span style="background-color: #8fe38f;"><span style="color:#8fe38f">'''[[User:The creeper2007|The creeper2007]]</span><sup>[[user_talk:The creeper2007|Talk!]]</sup></span>
Consider changing this to:
'''<span style="background-color: #8fe38f;"><span style="color:#8fe38f">[[User:The creeper2007|The creeper2007]]</span><sup>[[user_talk:The creeper2007|Talk!]]</sup></span>'''
I have not seen it cause issues, it's just something I noticed. Kind regards from PJvanMill (talk) 22:24, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Relisting
Hey again. Relisting AfDs is, to my knowledge, exclusively done by sysops. Also, I see you've relisted some discussions (like this one) when they had already been relisted two times (WP:RELIST says: in general, debates should not be relisted more than twice
). What probably needs to happen is that a sysop goes through the discussions you relisted, though to be honest I don't really know; you should contact User:Sandstein (or another regular AfD closer) about this. Kind regards from PJvanMill (talk) 23:39, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- Oh ok sorry The creeper2007Talk! 23:56, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- @PJvanMill:What should do about it now? The creeper2007Talk! 05:52, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- I've left a message on User:Sandstein's talk page. These discussions will soon be looked at by administrators anyhow, so I expect things will be fine. Kind regards from PJvanMill (talk) 14:25, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by ~ Amkgp 💬 18:31, 9 July 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by ~ Amkgp 💬 19:07, 9 July 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.
Saverio Guerra
Please explain this vendetta against actor Saverio Guerra. Why does his page keep disappearing. I would like to "civilly" ask for an explanation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rarmin (talk • contribs) 20:25, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Rarmin: I have the answer to your question. If you would re-ask your question in a AGF and civil way, I would answer it. The creeper2007Talk! Be well, stay safe 20:34, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Saverio Guerra
Hi, I'm curious as to why Saverio Guerra, actor, was deleted from Wikipedia. I would be most grateful for information. Thank you. Rarmin (talk) 20:45, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Rarmin: Hello Rarmin, I reconsidered the fact and I moved the page back to article space. The reason I have draftified it is because the fact that it is unsourced. but, then I noticed that it have a long page history, so I moved it back and started a deletion discussion about the notability of the subject of the article. Feel free to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saverio Guerra The creeper2007Talk! Be well, stay safe 20:49, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Thank you. Sorry if my "vendetta" comment was taken personally. This has been a bizarre set of circumstances. Larry David built the entire season of Curb Your Enthusiasm around Saverio Guerra's character. How could there even be a discussion about the worthiness of an actor with featured roles on three hit series? Someone who dislikes Guerra personally seems to started this series of deletions. I will be happy to move this conversation to the deletion page, but I think the very suggestion of a deletion is strange. It is quite possible that Guerra will be nominated for an Emmy later this month. Will that establish his value as an actor? Again, I mean no disrespect to you and appreciate your help with this. Rarmin (talk) 20:57, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Rarmin:Well, if the actor is nominated, then it is for sure notable. The thing is, we dont know yet and there aren't enough sources on the page. and, either way, the page's quality seems very low, so even if they do get nominated, then I would still suggest to Blow it all up and start again. Also, I would also bring the fact that they might get nominated on the deletion discussion page. The creeper2007Talk! Be well, stay safe 21:00, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Thanks. I didn't create this page and agree that it is weak. I will prepare a more properly sourced page and see what happens on July 28 (Emmy announcements). Thanks again. Rarmin (talk) 21:04, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Rarmin: I'm thinking that if they get nominated for Emmy, then there would be media coverage of the actor. If there isn't, it is very likely that they still won't meet notability guidelines. Again, please post your thoughts at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saverio Guerra. I would also add that we don't know if they would be nominated, so per Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, it should be deleted. The creeper2007Talk! Be well, stay safe 21:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks again for your support. I would appreciate it if you could delete my comments about Saverio Guerra, as I am withdrawing any interest in his page. Do whatever you think is best. Rarmin (talk) 23:23, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Rarmin: Hello there, deleting messages isn't possible, the next best alternative is to archive it. Archiving. The creeper2007Talk! Be well, stay safe 00:57, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Your Message Title
Your message here. The creeper2007Talk! Be well, stay safe 04:00, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello there
Test message to see if lowercase sigmabot III works The creeper2007Talk! Be well, stay safe 04:48, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
Hi The creeper2007! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Your thread has been archived
Hi The creeper2007! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
July 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bluffton High School (Indiana), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please also remove the markup from your talk page that makes it impossible to see what you are typing John from Idegon (talk) 02:32, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- John from Idegon Hello there, but I am not adding/changing content because I'm reverting content removal vandalism. I am not sure what you mean. please review your edit at [[1]] The creeper2007Talk! Be well, stay safe 03:03, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- No, you are not reverting vandalism in any way. The IP removed content that was in violation of WP:NLIST, WP:BLP, and WP:ALUMNI. You restored it. Don't do it again. John from Idegon (talk) 04:34, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- @John from Idegon: alright there. I just read up the NLIST and ALUMNI. Sorry about that. but, next time could you word it in a more WP:AGF way? The creeper2007Talk! Be well, stay safe 04:42, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- No, you are not reverting vandalism in any way. The IP removed content that was in violation of WP:NLIST, WP:BLP, and WP:ALUMNI. You restored it. Don't do it again. John from Idegon (talk) 04:34, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Rollback granted
Hi The creeper2007. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account for one month. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! GeneralNotability (talk) 17:53, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- Actually, after reading the talk page discussion from earlier today, I've revoked rollback. Please consider enrolling in WP:CVUA and your trainer can recommend when you should get rollback. GeneralNotability (talk) 18:05, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations!
CVU Academy Graduate | |
Congratulations from both myself and all of the instructors at the Counter Vandalism Unit Academy on your successful completion of the Counter Vandalism Unit Academy. You completed your final exam with a score of 97%. Well done! Further information on your achievement can be found on this page.
It has been a pleasure working with you these past few weeks, and thank you for offering to help out in removing vandalism from the project's articles. If you ever need any advice or assistance in the future, you're always welcome on my talk page. Hope to see you around! ~~~~ |
-- puddleglum2.0 21:37, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Announcing WikiLoop DoubleCheck
Dear Wikipedians and contributors, the open source Wikipedia review tool, previously "WikiLoop Battlefield" has completed its name vote and is announcing its new name: WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Read the full story on the program page on Meta-wiki, learn about ways to support this tool, and find out what future developments are coming for this tool.
Thank you to everyone who took part in the vote!
xinbenlv Talk, Remember to "ping" me 18:28, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- Xinbenlv, Just so you know, wikiloop double-check's page have not been moved over yet. The creeper2007Talk! Be well, stay safe 18:35, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020).
- There is an open request for comment to decide whether to increase the minimum duration a sanction discussion has to remain open (currently 24 hours).
- Speedy deletion criterion T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) has been repealed following a request for comment.
- Speedy deletion criterion X2 (pages created by the content translation tool) has been repealed following a discussion.
- There is a proposal to restrict proposed deletion to confirmed users.
The Signpost: 2 August 2020
- Special report: Wikipedia and the End of Open Collaboration?
- COI and paid editing: Some strange people edit Wikipedia for money
- News and notes: Abstract Wikipedia, a hoax, sex symbols, and a new admin
- In the media: Dog days gone bad
- Discussion report: Fox News, a flight of RfAs, and banning policy
- Featured content: Remembering Art, Valor, and Freedom
- Traffic report: Now for something completely different
- News from the WMF: New Chinese national security law in Hong Kong could limit the privacy of Wikipedia users
- Obituaries: Hasteur and Brian McNeil
Retired?!?
Hey creeper2007.
Sorry to see that you've put up a retirement notice and especially to read the text under it. I would like you to know that I don't think the community sees you as a "hassle". It's just that you were going too fast. I definitely like your enthusiasm, but it has happened that your enthusiasm had you charging into things for which you didn't have the necessary knowledge or experience.
I think you can be a good editor if you take things a bit more slowly, maybe ask for advice more (my door is open :)
)... And maybe it would be an idea to do more of the 'good old' article work, as there is a lot you can learn there that is also helpful for other Wikipedia activities. Perhaps you would be interested in fixing broken articles at WP:cleanup?
Anyway, I think this would be a sad ending to your 'Wikipedia journey'.
Kind regards from PJvanMill)talk( 00:37, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck
Hi The creeper2007/Archive 1,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.