User talk:The brown pill
February 2019
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:37, 8 February 2019 (UTC)- @TonyBallioni: The block was changed to indefinite. Should the template be updated? --DannyS712 (talk) 20:40, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- In this case, I think they can figure it out... TonyBallioni (talk) 20:54, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Quadriga Fintech Solutions
[edit]
On 2 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Quadriga Fintech Solutions, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that up to C$250 million in cryptocurrencies owed to 115,000 customers cannot be accessed due to the unexpected death of the founder of Quadriga, who was the only person who knew the password? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Quadriga Fintech Solutions. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Quadriga Fintech Solutions), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The brown pill (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #25473 was submitted on Jun 04, 2019 19:46:30. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 19:46, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Patrick Little (American politician)
[edit]
Hello, The brown pill. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Patrick Little".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 08:22, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
"Generation Zyklon" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Generation Zyklon. Since you had some involvement with the Generation Zyklon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. BDD (talk) 15:06, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
The article Bithumb has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Notability per GNG not established for yet another robbed Bitcoin exchange. Only isolated mentions in mainstream media because of the large trades related to it.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ysangkok (talk) 16:40, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bithumb is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bithumb until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ysangkok (talk) 16:11, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
The article BitFlyer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
notability not established for yet another Bitcoin exchange with no independent coverage, based on press releases
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ysangkok (talk) 08:58, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
The article Upbit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
notability not established for small korean exchange whose only claim-to-fame is the many times it was hacked, which is very common among cryptocurrency exchanges
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ysangkok (talk) 17:28, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Cryptopia
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Cryptopia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cryptopia. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 TT me 00:47, 1 October 2020 (UTC)