User talk:The Syco Killer

November 2022

Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that in this edit to Arzu Rana Deuba, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 06:19, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sulav Kc. The edit that i have done to Arzu Rana Deuba, is done by me it was not any mistake it doesn't make any sense in that edit that you restored you have done a mistake by restoring it.

Thank you. @Mako001 The Syco Killer (talk) 06:45, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See my talkpage for reply Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 11:42, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Bbb23 may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' user pages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on user page etiquette. Thank you. Blanchey (talk) 10:49, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Toran Shumsher Jung Bahadur Rana. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:05, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Toshima Karki

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Toshima Karki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Paul W (talk) 13:25, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense on userpage

Stop adding nonsense to your userpage. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 17:44, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now you've done it again. You dishonor Nepal and your family. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 02:48, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Favonian, should the block be made complete and access to userspace denied? They are using it as if it was their own website. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 02:53, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Favonian (talk) 12:43, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Syco Killer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I should be unblocked beacuse I have done everything that I can in wikipedia I have broken the policy of wikipedia. I have realised it now I can prove anyway you now that I will not such activities from now I should be given a last chance.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:39, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The Syco Killer (talk) 12:23, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser note: Confirmed to a whole bunch of others at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sulavxettri, TPA and email revoked to match the other accounts. --Blablubbs (talk) 12:51, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]