User talk:The Stickler

Welcome!

Hello, The Stickler, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

And don't forget, the edit summary is your friend. :) – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 16:04, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lennon

It shouldn't and they should be changed too.--Crestville 18:58, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you are interested in working on Beatles articles, put your name on this: List of Beatles Participants. You will be very welcome! --andreasegde 17:55, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

date formats

I have notices you changing dates in lots of places to the format you like. How you spend your time working in wikipedia is your choice, however, when a date is part of a citation template there is a specified format and the template only recognises one style. In the Isobelle Carmody page I corrected the dates for the citations so that they do not display as red-links. Where the value "accessdate =" is used in a template, the format must be entered as "yyyy-mm-dd". This is documented in the citation template page WP:CITET. I do prefer the date format of "Month dd, yyyy", and always have written dates that way. If you change dates in the articles I work on, mostly I will not correct your changes back to my preferred style, because it is a trivial thing, and have only done so in this instance because you broke the template. Stellar 12:50, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

British spellings

Please don't change American spellings to British ones. By long consensus, we leave these as the original author of an article put them, in order to avoid conflict. As the poster above says, this applies to dates as well. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style (spelling) and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers). Chick Bowen 17:13, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please heed the above, and do not change American to British spellings, or vice-versa. Thanks. - Special-T (talk) 19:36, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah - I had scanned the article for Brit/Yank spelling issues and hadn't found any. You seem to indeed have done the right thing - checked for a preponderance of one or the other and standardized (-ised) the article. Obviously with an article that has no particular relation to the US or GB, either choice is suitable. My apologies. - Special-T (talk) 19:48, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seems fine to me. Thanks for being civil when faced with an undeserved warning! - Special-T (talk) 19:09, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Date format in Opera roles table

Hi, I noticed that you changed date format for opera articles in "Roles table" section with remarks "Made the date style consistent and corrected incorrect date formatting". FYI, the format is per our guideline - Refer http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Opera/Article_styles_and_formats. The format MM DD, YYYY is our standard format for roles table (not for dates in article's paragraph) and has been done to almost all articles which have "Role table" sections - therefore your changes made them inconsistent with hundred other opera articles. Refer articles for noted composers such as Verdi's, Puccini's, Wagner's, Handel's, etc. I have undo all your changes. Thanks - Jay (talk) 14:09, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In Project Opera, we work based on consensus. I will post your reply in Project Opera talkpage, and lets see what other members have to say. If majority agree to change the date format, then it is fine with me. Refer here. Before that, please dont make any changes because it involves more than 100 articles. If we want to change, we will change all of them too. Thanks - Jay (talk) 00:06, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I will amend our format guidelines to use DATE MONTH YEAR format. For that, you can change back the date format that I undid from yours. Perhaps, if you have the time, you can also help us to change other articles that have been set to MONTH DATE, YEAR. Thanks - Jay (talk) 17:13, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lauren Jackson

I noticed the spelling change of center to centre as far as her position goes. This is more simply me asking than criticizing your change. In Canadian English, of which I write/speak, centre is spelled centre in everything but sports. In basketball, hockey, football etc. the position's name is center. Is this the same in Australia? I'd imagine it is as this is a proper noun describing the name of the position, and not a common noun describing a position in relation to everything else. But again, just asking for my own curiosity's sake more than anything. Shootmaster 44 (talk) 09:31, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal

I checked one of his edits, didn`t check all. Thanks for sorting it.andycjp (talk) 13:43, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Battlestar page

Please stop changing the spelling on the Battlestar Galactica page, it comes off as nothing but vandalism, akin to an American going to the Doctor Who page and changing the spelling over there. Pyro721 (talk) 22:58 July 21, 2010 (UTC)

Battlestar

Hi. I noticed your recent edit(s) to Battlestar (reimagining). If you have a strong opinion on which variant of English should be used in this article, please discuss it on the talk page. While the article was first written using American spelling, and might be said to have "strong[er] national ties" to the U.S. than to the UK, the article has evolved smoothly into British English (and arguably, being shot in Canada may give it strong enough national ties to use British/Canadian spelling). Consensus should be established as to which variant to use, and then that use should be kept. I don't believe you've behaved improperly, I just thought I'd try to preemptively avert a more serious dispute. Thanks! ☯.Zen Swashbuckler.☠ 03:02, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stanton Welch

The article Stanton Welch has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 07:37, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, The Stickler. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, The Stickler. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, The Stickler. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]