User talk:The Spudicus

Welcome!

Hello, The Spudicus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Pimp my bag, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! James Robson (talk) 22:48, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Pimp my bag

A tag has been placed on Pimp my bag requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. James Robson (talk) 22:48, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Ianxp (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

PhilKnight (talk) 00:37, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Spudicus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why have I been blocked as a sockpuppet of someone that I don't know? I have done nothing wrong on wikipedia so why should I pay for someone else's action?

Decline reason:

I agree that it seems probable that this account is a sock. It seems improbable that this is someone you don't know. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:16, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Spudicus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I as just editing my school's and my sister's school's pages and putting links to them in disambiguation pages but then I was blocked as a sock because someone else of the 681 pupils(Figure should be c.660) at my school decided to vandalize wikipedia. Is this a fare way to treat new editors who just want to help the project?

Decline reason:

Don't you think it's an incredible coincidence that you show up two weeks after Ianxp was blocked indefinitely to make similar edits and create an article about a non-notable company operated out of the same Irish school? Can you see why it seems that you're Ianxp to us? — Daniel Case (talk) 19:03, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The Spudicus (talk) 16:18, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Spudicus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I can see why it may look suspicious to you but not all people in this school are Ianxp. Also if I were Ianxp and was blocked indefinitely wouldn't it be impossible to create this account in the first place? As for the company, my limited research into Ianxp's contributions shows no sign of any such edits, in fact the only common edits seen to be the school's page so why must I bear the label of a sockpuppet?

Decline reason:

Looking at your contribs, I have to agree with Daniel Case and FisherQueen--it's obvious you're somebody's sockpuppet. And even if you weren't, creating a page about a non-notable company three times is considered spamming. Talk page protected. — Blueboy 96 22:25, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.