User talk:The Probability Wizard

You utterly sad, pathetic, IQ deficient human beings. I used to feel sorry for your type, but no longer do. Cannot wait for the ACTUAL, REAL Wikipedia to come in and destroy all of your lame efforts to exercise power in a manner you are all, now entirely proven, incapable of handling. Salutations and farewell, morons!!!!!The Probability Wizard 22:00, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Paul Banks (singer). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 07:39, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please state here the exact insertion of information that you have categorised as being "incorrect". So far, I have worked mostly in terms of removing unsourced or poorly sourced information from that article (eg. removing a personal blog as a citation as well as the material that pertained to that information), as well as re-formatting the article in accordance with the standards and policy set out for musicians. If you can supply the exact statements or information I inserted into the article that were not cited, I would then like to undo the reverts with the addition of the correct additions, assuming this is permissible. Thank you, The Probability Wizard. The Probability Wizard 16:41, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

In addition, the citation to Banks' actual birthplace was indeed included, but appears either not to have registered when the edits were saved or to have been removed. The citation provided cites an actual Birth record, as opposed to a very outdated article in which Banks is not quoted as stating he was born in Clacton as has later been made clearer that he was not born there, but rather had visited, though the source is a video and therefore not usable as a source here. A link to a birth record therefore appears much more easily verifiable, and that is why it was selected. I am in the process now of reinserting that exact citation and it should hopefully be available to see shortly. Many thanks, The Probability WizardThe Probability Wizard 16:54, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aurora Prince, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

McGeddon (talk) 08:03, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

You must request an unblock of your primary account if you wish to continue editing Wikipedia. Read WP:SOCKBLOCK for what to do and what not to do at this point. --McGeddon (talk) 17:19, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:04, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:36, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]