User talk:The Norse

You have recently created the article 403 Forbiddena. This was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article: if you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a review at Wikipedia:Deletion review. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:09, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content

Per your request, I pulled the last version of the deleted article and placed it in your userspace: User:The Norse/403 Forbiddena. The article should not be recreated in the main userspace unless you can provide sources that show it meets WP:MUSIC notability criteria. Thanks, OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: I've moved List of Samurai Shodown characters to a user sub-page.

That's all well and good, but I have one major objection: present tense is how we discuss legend and literature in the English language, even if they never did happen, and even if it is a retelling of the distant past (see [1], for example). Unless there is a WP guideline for fiction that I am seriously missing, the present tense is correct. -Missing NOOO 00:38, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense. If this is being done absolutely to-the-letter correct, it should be very clear when things are taking place (and I don't think it's going to be that hard, considering how little backstory most characters have). It would be something like:

In SS5, character is looking for blah.
In SS, character is motivated by meh.
Prior to SS2, character is on trip to ___ and does not make appearance.
In SS2, character etc. etc.

Granted, I'm nowhere near done revising the entire damn article, but what can I do? I'm busy in real life. Kind of on the "if I don't haul butt right now, I will not stay in school" level. -Missing NOOO 13:53, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wild Arms 2

Hey, Norse. I have no problem at all with you using my WA2 write-up, and I'm glad it's going to get some use after all. Sorry I wasn't able to finish it, I got sidetracked with other projects. Maybe I'll get around to updating the article sometime now that it's at a serviceable state, but I appreciate the message and that you're trying to get the Wild Arms articles in better shape. Nall 02:18, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oban Star Racers Trivia

I'll link the source, its from the Official Oban Forums, some members on there were in contact with the creator and those were some answers he provided. I'll link to it in the Oban page.--Sir-Koji (talk) 00:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Centralized TV Episode Discussion

Over the past months, TV episodes have been reverted by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here [2]. --Maniwar (talk) 00:29, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Bivattchee

A tag has been placed on Bivattchee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TTN

This comment was completely unacceptable. Comments like that can result in blocking. I suggest cessation. seresin || wasn't he just...? 23:35, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Nakon 23:38, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Norse (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Check my history again, there isn't any vandalism there. Your over-defensiveness of TTN isn't grounds for a blocking.

Decline reason:

Looking over your edits, I see a lot of disruption, and some very dubious edits which led to you being "mistakenly" blocked for being a vandalism only account. Given the horrendous personal attack you made to TTN, I see no reason to unblock you. — Ryan Postlethwaite 00:01, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

lol lack of Appeal option, this'll never get responded to. I don't see any "dubious" or unconstructive edits to any articles. Could you point a few out so I can learn from my alleged mistakes? - The Norse (talk) 00:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A quick look at your talk page history[3] shows numerous times you have been asked to remain civil and not make personal attacks. This final one on TTN was disgraceful and could easily have earned you an indef block in it's own right, given the previous history of attacks, and you inability to learn from them despite other users gently prodding you, I again believe that an indef block is the correct option. Ryan Postlethwaite 00:27, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh hey, a response. That's cool. I personally feel that having the fortitude to call out TTN on his obvious flaws should warrant a few dozen Barnstars, but I see where you're coming from. If you insist on keeping the block, I would like to formally request the reason for this account's blocking to be changed to reflect the real reason instead of being noted as a common vandal. Maybe a reason along the lines of "being a pain in the ass" like that one guy on Nakon's talk page stated.

On that subject, maybe he should be blocked too, after all he did use a cuss word and that's technically worse than anything I've ever said. - The Norse (talk) 00:53, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bivattchee

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bivattchee, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. seresin ( ¡? ) 00:26, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Vinsfeld.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Vinsfeld.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Caina.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Caina.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Antenora.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Antenora.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ptolomea.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ptolomea.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lizprofileartwork.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Lizprofileartwork.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Judecca.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Judecca.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ardprofileartwork.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ardprofileartwork.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:WAXFJcoverart.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:WAXFJcoverart.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo aquarion.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo aquarion.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:12, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]