User talk:The Movie King!

Warnings

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:G-Force (film), is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Where the Wild Things Are (film). However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. — Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 19:42, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Do not do so, as you did here. — Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 19:44, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of You Again (film)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as You Again (film), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 19:48, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Avatar (2009 film). When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Avatar (2009 film). Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit and is especially useful when reading the edit history of the page. Thank you.

Your removal of G-Force from the list of Walt Disney Pictures films that mix live action with animation==

How is it that G-Force is not included in that list? Struhs (talk) 21:31, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it from the list because the only thing that's probably animated about that movie is the animals' talking and their fighting moves, I bet for the most of it is that they used real animals in the movie. If you're gonna put G-Force on that list, why not put Underdog and Beverly Hills Chihuahua on there as well. The Movie King! (talk) 20:40, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, but there is a huge difference between making the mouth move so an animal appears to talk and animating entire fight sequences that interact with live action. There are major similarities between this movie, Who Framed Roger Rabbit? and Enchanted regardless of whether they use cell animation or CGI. Struhs (talk) 16:30, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009 (redux)

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Old Dogs (film). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 21:34, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Old Dogs (film). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cirt (talk) 22:33, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Cirt (talk) 22:40, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Blocked for 24 hours. Addition of unsourced information to articles, after multiple warnings, above. Cirt (talk) 02:10, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. Permanent.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Bambifan101 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

--PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:26, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]