User talk:The Little Internet Kitty

Your recent edits on Flight attendant

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from an article. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --James Bond 08:53, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Anal sex

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Leebo ^T/C 22:45, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Salami-Punk

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Salami-Punk, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NMChico24 18:47, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Salami-Punk

A tag has been placed on Salami-Punk, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Obvious Hoax. 1 GHIT for "Salami Punk"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. exolon 18:56, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

On your addition to the Imperial Guard page: I would have to say that WW1 tactics were not that bad, and, compared to a lot of wars, were extremely good. :) SanchiTachi 16:43, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but they're still primitive in comparison to modern armies. --The Little Internet Kitty 23:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Nu metal

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Nu metal. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 10:47, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]