User talk:The Grand Sweets And Snacks

September 2016

Hello, I'm 331dot. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Grand Sweets and Snacks have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 08:35, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to The Grand Sweets and Snacks. Please make your case on the page's talk page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 09:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to The Grand Sweets and Snacks. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 09:13, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... My article is under the - speedy delete radar. why is this happening ? I am in official person in charge of the company profile. kindly help The Grand Sweets And Snacks (talk) 09:17, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you work for this company, you should not be directly editing an article about it per the conflict of interest policy. If changes are needed, please suggest them on the article talk page first(Talk:The Grand Sweets and Snacks). As a paid employee of this company, you will need to review and comply with the paid editing policy, as required by Wikipedia's Terms of Use. You also will likely be asked to change your username, as usernames cannot be that of a company per the username policy. 331dot (talk) 09:20, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The speedy deletion tag has been removed. 331dot (talk) 09:23, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To change your username, please visit this page for instructions. 331dot (talk) 09:37, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:The Grand Sweets and Snacks, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. 331dot (talk) 09:35, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Widr (talk) 13:56, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Editor,

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The Grand Sweets And Snacks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

M.reddy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Selected an inappropriate username by mistake. I want to set that right now. Please give me a chance. I was new to Wikipedia and it was a honest mistake. Hello Editor, I am sorry for not making the correct contributions to Wikipedia. Although I meant to put up useful information somehow I couldn’t. I was unaware of the guidelines and I never intended to do this on purpose. i want to now start making useful contributions that add value. I promise I will follow all Wikipedia protocols. Kindly give me a chance to et this right. I apologise and request you again. Thank you very much. --The Grand Sweets And Snacks (talk) 08:39, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Too similar to an exisiting user ,see below. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:35, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your proposed username seems OK; however, it will help the administrators decide to unblock you if you explain what exactly it is you did incorrectly and why it is incorrect. People who simply promise to 'follow all Wikipedia protocols' will sometimes say so without exactly understanding what they had done incorrectly. You also may need to agree to not directly edit about your company. 331dot (talk) 08:57, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your proposed username is too close to Mr Eddy (talk · contribs). PhilKnight (talk) 02:33, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thank you. This is noted.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The Grand Sweets And Snacks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Mreddy16 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Hello Please accept this new username. After the feedback about the other username, I am proposing this new one. Kindly accept my request. Thank you very much.-The Grand Sweets And Snacks (talk) 05:20, 22 September 2016 (UTC)-[reply]

Decline reason:

No answers to questions posed by 331dot on 21 September, eight days ago. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:44, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You still haven't answered questions posted above by 331dot, so this unblock request will be declined soon unless you provide answers. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:36, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Helllo Vanjagenije and 331dot. Have been sick past few days. I don't want to make any mistakes in the answers. Hence, the delay. Please give me some more time to reply. I should be able to respond maximum within a week. I apologise for the delay. There isn't any other option. I would have made it earlier if it were possible. Please consider my request. I am sorry for all the inconvenience it is causing you. Thank you.

--The Grand Sweets And Snacks (talk) 05:26, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]