User talk:The EthWebster

Welcome!

Hello, The EthWebster, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:59, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much! That was very helpful. I will take into consideration all you have said.

( The EthWebster , Did I do something wrong, correct? Tell me on my talk page! on 29 June 2012

In response to your feedback

Thanks for visiting! If you have questions, visit Wikipedia:Tutorial or contact me at my talk page.

SwisterTwister talk 21:51, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rank ups

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

How do I get into the 'Registered users' permission group at Wikipedia? There's so many pages I want to be able to maintain, but my permission group is too low to be able to edit them. Thanks.

( The EthWebster , Did I do something wrong, correct? Tell me on my talk page! on 30 June 2012

See Wikipedia:User access levels#Autoconfirmed users; as you've already made more than the required minimum 10 edits, you're waiting solely on your account to be more than 4 days old, starting from your first edit 29 Jun 1630, so 3 Jul 1630. Welcome, and good luck. Dru of Id (talk) 10:27, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

( The EthWebster , Did I do something wrong, correct? Tell me on my talk page! on 30 June 2012

Speedy deletion nomination of David Left

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on David Left requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the page be "userfied" or emailed to you. —Noiratsi (talk) 14:09, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT remove speedy deletion templates from articles you created. The template has been replaced. PK T(alk) 14:20, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to David Wright has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: David Wright was changed by The EthWebster (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.947826 on 2013-04-24T09:45:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:45, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at David Wright with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Yintan 09:47, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Muslim with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Yintan 09:50, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Muslim. Yintan 09:51, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:55, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The EthWebster (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

but i dont wana be bloked bcuz i am good guy and i dint men to do it like init it was my baby brover k r we k now plzz

( The EthWebster , Did I do something wrong, correct? Tell me on my talk page! on 24 April 2013

09:56, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No-one wants to get blocked. As to your 'brover', you'll have to do better than that. WP:BROTHER Peridon (talk) 11:08, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.