User talk:TheVoiceYouthSeries

December 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Voice (U.S. TV series). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 14:51, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Wtwilson3. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Chris Hemsworth because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) (User:Wtwilson3) — 19:08, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Luke Hemsworth, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) (User:Wtwilson3) — 19:10, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Voice (U.S. TV series). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) (User:Wtwilson3) — 19:21, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Jamie Bell, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) (User:Wtwilson3) — 19:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 06:07, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]