User talk:ThePuppetSmasher

June 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Longhair\^talk 10:24, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ThePuppetSmasher (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Longhair, how many sock puppets do you think there are on wikipedia? How much bias do you think there is? How many paid accounts are there? I merely learned today just how deep it all goes. I also learned how many editors do not follow wikipedia's guidelines. My goal is to be a part of https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Spam and to question those that seem to have a bias. Especially when they do not consider my arguments, just like you didn't. The fact that you locked this account merely makes you also appear as an Admin that is abusing their powers and are afraid that you too might be found out one day. If that's not true though, then you'd simply unblock me. Otherwise I will re access the website with a different IP and continue my mission. To clean up wikipedia. I'm tired of the internal underlying politics I'm witnessing. It sickens me.ThePuppetSmasher (talk) 10:31, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your accusations are both misplaced and offensive. This account will not be unblocked unless/until you are able to see how and where you are wrong. Also note that editing from an IP, any IP, is block evasion and qualifies the IP used for immediate block. ----Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:36, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Be sure to check their deleted contributions. -- Longhair\^talk 11:38, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I second the above 2600:1:C375:9DCD:61A5:5D48:EA0:8CFA (talk) 14:17, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]