User talk:TheProSamurai

No otherstuff

wp:otherstuffexists is not valid argument; sections like personality and abilities should be avoided per the manual of style for manga and anime as well as wp:fancruft. Additionally, Ichigo Kurosaki's article also follow this style.Tintor2 (talk) 23:37, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't assume bad faith. I'm not a robot, I can't edit every single article considering the time I have on wiki and the fact that I have more knowledge on some series than others. Moreover, lately, I have working on other characters' articles.Tintor2 (talk) 23:44, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SPI case notice

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheProSamurai. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 13:07, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for repeated edit warring and sockpuppetry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid ^(Talk) 21:22, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is TheProSamurai's block evasion. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 00:47, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because you have continued to use multiple accounts and also evaded your block by editing as 122.151.252.213 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), I have extended the duration of your block to indefinite. Sandstein 06:31, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheProSamurai (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am aware as to why I have been blocked. I believe the reason is that I have made some accounts (I think it was three accounts). Another reason was the evasion of my current block by editing while logged out of my account from another IP address, which I also used for "edit-warring". However, when I made the second account it was because, frankly I thought the name of my first account was not "cool". What I mean to say is that I've seen other people's accounts and the names the accounts had were short and related to the person's interest. You can see from the history that as soon I started using the second account, I gradually stopped using the first account. Another reason I made another account is because I had also found out that wikipedia accounts could not be deleted. However, sometimes on a tiring day, I was too lazy to log in and merely edited without my account and sometimes a certain family member of mine would edit without logging in since he didn't have an account. Now as for the third account, I had been in "edit wars" with someone (over something I was interested in). It was a long edit war and every time I looked in the history page it always had my account name many times. Overtime, I had become somewhat embarrassed because my name and my edits were always in the history page and I was the one who kept constantly arguing with someone else (I don't know if should who it was). As a result, I made a third account, but only for a very few certain pages also so that the person who I was arguing with would think that I finally stopped. Now, I know what I did was wrong but I did it with no malicious intentions and not for vandalism. I did it because that's I thought I should do. I didn't do it either to evade blocks (I didn't even know what block evasion meant until reading this). Since I know now that making accounts is unacceptable, I will stop making them and simply use one account. Not to mention that when I edited accounts, I only wrote what I thought was right and did not intend to vandalise. I enjoy anime and manga,and as you can see from my contributions most, or at least some, edits were not reverted. If unblocked I will try to contribute to anime and manga articles. I assume the assumption of good faith and am hoping for a response. Thank you for reading this.

Decline reason:

The unblock request does not address the reason for the block, which is not the previous sockpuppetry, but the evasion of your current block by editing while logged out of your account from another IP address, which you also used for edit-warring. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:00, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please list all the accounts you have ever used. Sandstein 07:14, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My accounts are arthurprica, theprosamurai and pinchsamurai I believe. Just to note, I am somewhat forgetful and there may be one more account or not.

Per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheProSamurai/Archive, there is also Stevenprica (talk · contribs). The unblock request does not address the reason for the block, which is not the previous sockpuppetry, but the evasion of your current block by editing while logged out of your account from another IP address, which you also used for edit-warring. I'm leaving the decision of whether or not to unblock you in the hands of the reviewing administrator. Sandstein 11:29, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just to note, stevenprica is actually the account of a family member of mine. This is a bit evident by the fact that my first account arthurprica differs in the first half from stevenprica (my name and my brother's name). Also check the email of stevenprica and it differs from mine.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheProSamurai (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am now even more aware as to why I have been blocked. The reason for my block was the evasion of my current block by editing while logged out of my account from another IP address (the Block evasion: as User:122.151.252.213), which I also used for "edit-warring". One reason for my block evasion was that sometimes on a tiring day, I was too lazy to log in and merely edited without my account and sometimes a certain family member of mine would edit without logging in since he didn't have an account. Now as I mentioned, sometimes I was too lazy to log in and by the time my account was blocked, I still kept editing from another IP address not because my account was blocked but because I was too lazy to log in and because I wanted the person who I normally have edit wars with to believe I (or my account) finally stopped annoying him. It wasn't until later on that I had actually found out that my account was blocked. Most of my edits from the other IP address were because of the reasons stated above, and only some few edits were to evade the block. Now, I know what I did was wrong but I did it with no malicious intentions and not for vandalism. I did it because that's I thought I should do. Since I know now that evading blocks is unacceptable, if unblocked, I will stop doing it by editing from other IP addresses and simply accept that if my account has been blocked and then I cannot edit for the time being. Not to mention that when I edited accounts, I only wrote what I thought was right and did not intend to vandalise. I enjoy anime and manga,and as you can see from my contributions most, or at least some, edits were not reverted. If unblocked I will try to contribute to anime and manga articles. I assume the assumption of good faith and am hoping for a response. Thank you for reading this.

Decline reason:

Your claim that you (and your relative?) used an IP account as you were "too lazy to log in" (that's a pretty incredibly degree of laziness) and "wanted the person who I normally have edit wars with to believe I (or my account) finally stopped annoying him" doesn't generate much confidence that you intend to edit in good faith if unblocked. The claim that you didn't realise you were blocked as you were using IP accounts also seems to sit awkwardly with your creation of multiple sockpuppet accounts. If you lodge another unblock request I'd suggest that it explain, in detail, a) what articles you intend to work on b) what edits you propose to make c) the references which you will draw on and d) how you will conduct yourself to avoid problems with other editors. Nick-D (talk) 08:36, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.