User talk:ThePen Winsock
ThePen Winsock, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi ThePen Winsock! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 27 January 2019 (UTC) |
February 2019
[edit]Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Future (rapper), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Your account shows that you have a history of removing "sourced or unsourced" verifiably materials from articles. Editing on Wikipedia is a privilege, our goal is to add, create, edit, and remove (when necessary). Please note that disruptive edits are NOT acceptable especially without a valid reason. If you find questionable edits, please leave citations asking for sourced materials instead of removing. VerifiedFixes (talk) 00:58, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Future (rapper). User fails to make corrections, fails to help with workload, makes inappropriate revision request on every article they come across. VerifiedFixes (talk) 20:06, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Let's try this another way.
[edit]I have given you two warnings about your behavior on articles and towards other users. You ignored the first warning, continued, and blatantly told me "I'm not an extended user and you're going to continue misusing features" even after you were asked to stop and was given an official warning.
I do not want to ban you but something has to change. If you see typos (correct them), in a world where everyone uses smart devices with autocorrect enabled typos are bound to happen. The way you're using the "roll back" feature violates user guidelines, if you see issues correct them responsibly and please use citations on questionable things submitted. The way you're operating on these articles is not beneficial by any means, you're not helping us with the workload. You're making things harder by taking time away from other articles that could be invested in by creating, editing, or deleting (serious offenses) but instead we're dealing with your misused privilege to edit.
You're also violating Wikipedia's t&c when you create false rules and apply them to how you see fit in the community. Template:Infobox_musical_artist#associated_acts or here does not state that there's a required project collaboration amount (per two collaborating artists) to be able to add an official collaboration to the infobox.
Last but not least. This is NOT spam, if you will kindly brush up on your user guidelines (once again) you will know that talk is used for many things including (addressing ALL user issues) especially before you report or ban.
VerifiedFixes (talk) 21:59, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
February 2019
[edit]Your edits are being disputed and reverted. Please discuss the change(s) you wish to make at the article's talk pages.
When your edits are disputed, please use the WP:BRD cycle. When you change content in a stable version of an article, if reverted, the onus is on you to show that your change should remain. Please discuss the change you wish to make at the article talk page and get consensus before restoring that content.
So, please stop and discuss and use the talk pages. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:29, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:11, 13 February 2019 (UTC)