Jump to content

User talk:TheLAXPlanespotter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

LAXspotter here! This is my talk page. If you need to contact me, just leave a message on my talk page and I will get back to you as soon as possible. Thanks!

Your submission at Articles for creation: NG Models Draft 1 (December 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 05:31, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, TheLAXPlanespotter! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 (talk) 05:31, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quick guidebook

[edit]
Before an aircraft is cleared for pushback, there must be fuel, passengers, and meals ready, as well as cleanliness and all pre-flight checklists done. Kinda the same thing with Wikipedia.

Hey there, TheLAXPlanespotter! Both being aviation enthusiasts, welcome to Wikipedia, an artificial satellite of Earth. Wikipedia should be a fun place for all editors, and if you have any problems with the system or group of contributors, please vent it to anyone available (including me) so that the problem can be resolved. Here are some of the basic rules you should know to get started.

  • Notability — Notability determines whether an article is deemed Wikipedia-worthy or not. To achieve the general notability checklist, one must have significant coverage from multiple reliable, secondary sources independent to the subject. Primary sources may be cited, but RSS sources must be available. There are some topics which has its own notability guideline, so check them out, but generally the GNG is a rule of thumb.
  • The other policies and guidelines — There are a ton of policies and guidelines on Wikipedia, and this is where things can get a bit frustrating. A lot of people love the policies, so when one gets reverted because of them, please don't take things personal, and talk with the other editor as well as learn the referenced policy. Experiences are the best method of learning the huge— and I mean huge— pyramid of policies here.
    • You can ignore (all) rules — There are times when policies just don't make sense, and this "policy" gives you a violation pass... sort of. Policies that you certainly must adhere to without excuses are the non-free content policy and the 3RR rule, etc. When thinking on ignoring a rule(s), consider whether it is sensical and improves the encyclopedia. If yes, then do it, or suggest it, per WP:IAR?.
  • Civility — Civility is a very important rule when interacting with others. Often discussions can get heated, or a user just annoys you. It is important to be civil when discussing, so that a problem can be solved without divisiveness inter-parties. Many discussions have went astray due to incivility.
  • Assume good faith — Assuming good faith in other editors is important. If you see an edit that looks suspicious, do not immediately judge the editor, calling them "foolish" "stupid" "violating rules" etc. Instead, properly undo the edit (IF APPROPRIATE), and/or talk/discuss with the editor. It can be a good learning experience for both of you, and it makes for a better environment within Wikipedia.
  • Be bold — If you see a problem on a Wikipedia article and you feel like it, fix it! Be bold in contributing is highly regarded and respected. However often bold, brave edits can be unintentionally wrong and can be reverted. If so, as stated above, "please don't take things personal, and talk with the other editor as well as learn the referenced policy."
  • There are a ton of essays made by Wikipedians that may help, though is not mandatory. See Essay directory to search for essays.
In Wikipedia, you act like an air traffic controller: patrolling, managing, while also having fun. There's also a break, and it's indefinite!

I hope you have a great time here, because that's what we want you to experience! Based on your data, here are some subplaces you can follow:

Again, happy editing, and Merry Christmas if you're celebrating... will celebrate. GeraldWL 16:17, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man. Nice to know there are others out there like me. Merry Christmas from the LAX-based LAXPlanespotter. TheLAXPlanespotter (talk) 17:02, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TheLAXPlanespotter, there are a lot of people like you and me here! See Category:Wikipedians interested in aviation for nearly all of them. GeraldWL 17:08, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi TheLAXPlanespotter! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How to cite, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:NG Models Draft 1

[edit]

Information icon Hello, TheLAXPlanespotter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:NG Models Draft 1, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:NG Models Draft 1

[edit]

Hello, TheLAXPlanespotter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "NG Models Draft 1".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:42, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiEagle - January 2022

[edit]
The WikiEagle
The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter
Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements
  • After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged.
  • On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue.
  • Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion.
  • The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7.
  • The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed.
  • The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125.
  • The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members

New Members

Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921.

Closed Discussions

Featured Article assessment

Good Article assessment

Deletion

Requested moves

Article Statistics
This data reflects values from DMY.
Aviation pages by quality
Quality
Total
FA 142
FL 15
A 56
GA 505
B 4,573
C 11,878
Start 15,082
Stub 18,754
List 2,539
Category 11,638
Disambig 653
File 2,713
Portal 629
Project 89
Redirect 1,518
Template 2,489
NA 66
Assessed 73,339
Unassessed 1
Total 73,340
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 251,937 Ω = 4.91
New/Ongoing Discussions

On The Main Page

Did you know...

Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list.
Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TheLAXPlanespotter&oldid=1063163865"