User talk:TheInformant09

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, TheInformant09, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! — ξ ^xplicit 17:28, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

Threatening warnings

If you leave threatening warnings for users once more, you will be blocked from editing. Please stick to the standard warnings. Resorting to personal attacks is never appropriate. Thank you. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:27, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment on User talk:96.224.63.175 (now deleted)

Do not, under any circumstances, threaten to fuck anybody up on Wikipedia. That sort of behavior is completely unacceptable and it will get you blocked very quickly. Instead, just revert the vandalism and move on; this denies the vandals any recognition. - Jredmond (talk) 21:31, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Law Abiding Citizen has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (t • c • r) 23:17, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zombieland

Hello, TheInformant09. You may already know this from the edit history, but I want to tell you the reason why American is in that part of the lead as [American]. Simply explained, the source does not state American; this is the reason it is inserted as [American] (as in that bracket) in the lead. For why specifying it as an American instance was even carried out, check out this link. Flyer22 (talk) 01:40, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Capitalism: A Love Story. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 01:30, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Rugrats characters, you will be blocked from editing. --Henry talk 01:32, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Capitalism: A Love Story . If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. This is the edit in question [1] --4wajzkd02 (talk) 01:39, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Fantastic Mr. Fox (film). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 23:53, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

TheInformant09 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

173.79.185.252 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Sammythesnake4". The reason given for Sammythesnake4's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

Blocking administrator: Cirt (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: It is patently obvious now that you are the same person as Sammythesnake4, so the autoblock served its purpose. I have changed this to a direct indefinate block of this account. — Jayron32 02:39, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for obvious abusive use of multiple accounts, see http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/Sammythesnake4 and declined autoblock-unblock request above. --Jayron32 02:39, 24 October 2009 (UTC). If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheInformant09 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here

Decline reason:

No grounds for unblocking provided. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 14:16, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheInformant09 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

no reason provided

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified sock of User:Sammythesnake4. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 15:13, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

GoodBye Wikipedia

Somebody got a hold of my ip address and created some account called Sammythesnake and decided to go around vandalizing pages. Now i have been blamed for a crime i did not commit. Sadly these bastards at wikipedia will not allow me to be unblocked. However, i will be back!!!TheInformant09 (talk) 03:00, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

COnsidering that this account and the Sammythesnake account have edited the exact same articles in the exact same manner, that seems like a rediculous proposition. It is much more likely that it is you managing both accounts. --Jayron32 05:48, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Devils Racecourse

The article Devils Racecourse has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable - no sources except press release (newsguide.us) and filmmakers' own websites + facebook & youtube pages; no evidence film was ever completed or released

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 4wajzkd02 (talk) 15:44, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Camp Friendship

The article Camp Friendship has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable - no secondary sources found, only source is camp's website

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 4wajzkd02 (talk) 16:03, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheInformant09 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I AM NOT A SOCK PUPPET OF SAMMY THE SNAKE 4

Decline reason:

Yes you are. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 20:19, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I DEMAND TO BE UNBLOCKED!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheInformant09 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I AM NOT A SOCK PUPPET OF SAMMY THE SNAKE 4! And give me proof that i am, and just because we edited 1 same article dosent mean it was me! THere are also other people using my IP Adress besides me

Decline reason:

It's not just the same IP address; you, Sammythesnake4, and all the other sockpuppet accounts are sharing the same computer as well. Technical evidence has Confirmed you're the same person. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 21:26, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheInformant09 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

that still dosent prove it was me though, and why would i edit so many other articles and then decide to vandalize some? i love wikipedia and i like to help by providing movie budgest, grosses, and other information to movie articles

Decline reason:

You've been confirmed by checkuser and the evidence of contributions to be the same user. Your only response to this is "No I'm not," which is not persuasive. And since you keep saying it over and over, I'm going to lock this page to prevent requiring any more administrators to take time reviewing the evidence and saying, once again, "Yes, you are." FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 03:08, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Articles for deletion nomination of Devils Racecourse

I have nominated Devils Racecourse, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devils Racecourse. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Dr.K. ^praxis_logos 02:54, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheInformant09 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Dr.K.^praxis_logos 06:50, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SOCK confirmed. --4wajzkd02 (talk) 15:58, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]