User talk:TheHistorianPHD

Welcome!

Hi TheHistorianPHD! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Ktrimi991 (talk) 19:23, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Souliotes Greece for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Souliotes Greece is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Souliotes Greece until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:59, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Quinlan The article does not contain data from the sources you have mentioned above.Thank you. TheHistorianPHD (talk) 22:35, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Souliotes (Greece), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:25, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CycloneYoris Please be more specific about which templates i removed and from what pages i removed them from.Thank you. TheHistorianPHD (talk) 22:29, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You blanked the page at Souliotes (Greece) which is a valid redirect. If you want to delete a redirect then refer to WP:RfD, but please do not blank the page again. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:33, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CycloneYoris Be more specific please.I only added an edit at Souliotes (Greece),i didn't blank the page. TheHistorianPHD (talk) 22:40, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh really? Why are you lying? You clearly were the one who blanked the page. Also, please stop telling me to be "more specific" when I'm clearly being specific enough! CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:45, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CycloneYoris Please don't call me names and be more polite.If you can't explain to me what the exact problem is,i won't be able to help you.Thank you. TheHistorianPHD (talk) 22:47, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're the one who is lying, since you said that you did not blank the page when it clearly was you, and I'm being polite enough! I would also suggest if you could please stop pinging me, since I have no interest in engaging in this discussion any further. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:58, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CycloneYoris I have to repeat myself...please don't call me names.If you wish to be left alone please don't message me.Thank you. TheHistorianPHD (talk) 23:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me? What names am I calling you? Also, what part of "please stop pinging me" don't you understand? I will leave you alone once you stop mentioning and pinging me. Have a nice day. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:03, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CycloneYoris Have a nice day too friend. TheHistorianPHD (talk) 23:09, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 00:18, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To add to the above box, you've been blocked because you are here to right great wrongs, while gaslighting and personally attacking other editors on the way. While I considered a topic ban, your edits are exclusively to one area, so this has the same effect. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 00:20, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Isabelle Belato I am a new user,so i don't have the time to edit too many areas which i actually had and anyone can see..Tell me please,how exactly am i attacking other editors?Please copy paste my attacks. TheHistorianPHD (talk) 00:26, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saying, without any evidence whatsoever, over multiple articles, that they are Albanian propaganda is a personal attack on the editors responsible for those articles. Example: diff. Then going around and blanking multiple redirects (multiple times) and telling editors they are lying is also a personal attack. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 00:36, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Isabelle Belato First of all,i have never said someone was lying,i have only asked for clarifications,if anyone called someone a liar it was not me and you can see it on the discution above.Secondly,i have tried to edit the pages you are reffering to with evidences based on facts and not fiction and they keep deleting them.I don't know what you mean by blanking or redirecting since i only did an editing on those pages.Before blocking me and calling me a gashlighter and all you should have checked the talk session on those pages or better yet you should have made a little research on their articles.If your aim is to support a political propaganda based on false facts,which is not allowed on Wikipedia that is your problem.Wikipedia needs a reason for deleting a page,so my reason was this:these articles are based on the Albanian propaganda.I wasn't attacking an editor,i was just giving an explanation.You blocking me without even a discution and for the wrong reasons says a lot about you.

Hey,how is it called when a person thinks they are God?NPD!!!

Do whatever you like,i can always log in from my 16 brothers and sisters account.Thanks for proving how lame Wikipedia is.Kisses Albo. TheHistorianPHD (talk) 00:56, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As stated in WP:NPA, both Abusive, defamatory, or derogatory phrases based on race, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, age, religious or political beliefs, disability, ethnicity, nationality, etc. and Accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence. are considered personal attacks. And you've done it again here.

Additionally, your continual disruptive and tendentious editing includes creation of POV forks (Souliotes Greece and Zalongo mountain), content blanking and removal ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]), removal of deletion notices ([7]), ranting about "Albanian propaganda" ([8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]), copyright violations ([14] and Zalongo mountain), and gaslighting people trying to warn you ([15], [16], and more). I hope these numerous examples help explain why you have been blocked. Regards. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:11, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Quinlan Actually i am being very polite,i don't care to insult anyone.You 3 people are all over me and i think that Wikipedia must be contacted about how certain groups in here are blocking people and are supporting political propaganda articles.That i need to do.

My content does not violate any 'copyright violation' since i have written it by myself.The articles you have previously gave me are totally different than mine.These numerous examples in your message have not explained anything,they are just empty words,your opinion,nothing to be verified which is,i think,against the Wikipedia rules.People who support biased information,political propaganda and accuse others without any evidence...by using the Wikipedia language have no place in Wikipedia.I think i need to contact others,so larevedere.Regards @Zoro TheHistorianPHD (talk) 01:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

TheHistorianPHD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

TheHistorianPHD (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

[[Wikipedia:Autoblock|Autoblocked]] because your IP address was recently used by "[[User:TheHistorianPHD|TheHistorianPHD]]". The reason given for TheHistorianPHD's block is: "Clearly [[WP:NOTHERE|not here to build an encyclopedia]]; [[WP:RGW|Tendentious editing]]".

Blocking administrator: [[User:‪Isabelle Belato‬|‪Isabelle Belato‬]] ([[User talk:‪Isabelle Belato‬|talk]] • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Aoidh (talk) 14:19, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PhilipPastor (talk · contribs) and EmpireoftheSultans (talk · contribs) have been blocked as Confirmed sockpuppets of TheHistorianPHD. - Aoidh (talk) 14:21, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]