User talk:TheGreatestMayonaiseEver

Dear administrators (@PhilKnight:), This shows that this is a possible sockpuppet of User:SmilingJoeWalz Eni vak (speak) 22:52, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Regarding this comment, the author needs to go wash out his vagina. What a ridiculous assertion! TheGreatestMayonaiseEver (talk) 23:25, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheGreatestMayonaiseEver (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey, you'd better unblock me, or I won't flush the toilet the next time I defacate in an LDS church building TheGreatestMayonaiseEver (talk) 21:35, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 22:45, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheGreatestMayonaiseEver (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dmries stated that the reason for the block is that this is a "vandalism only" account. I plan on using the account for legitimate edits, as well as vandalism. Thus, it is not a "vandalism only" account. TheGreatestMayonaiseEver (talk) 23:20, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This account has not made any constructive edits. Talk page access revoked due to inappropriate comments to other users on this page - further appeals can be made via UTRS. stwalkerster (talk) 23:33, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

August 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 21:30, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(NON-ADMIN COMMENT) https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Book_of_Mormon&diff=prev&oldid=910268766&diffmode=source

Dear administrators (@PhilKnight:), This shows that this is a possible sockpuppet of User:SmilingJoeWalz Eni vak (speak) 22:52, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]