User talk:TheFlyman

Welcome!

Hello, TheFlyman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

December 2008

Hi, I noticed the new article you created, and redirected it towards an existing article, List of Pennsylvania Railroad lines west of Pittsburgh. You are more than welcome to help expand that article! And thanks again for your contributions! --Mr. Vernon (talk) 05:49, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Pennsylvania Railroad 7048, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. PDCook (talk) 00:29, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article CSX Saginaw Subdivision, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:27, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Pennsylvania Railroad 7048. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:42, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pennsylvania Railroad 520

I decided to redirect your article to PRR 520 (which is sourced and follows the precedent of using "PRR ____" for article names). I developed the article seperately and only recently discovered yours. You're welcome add in any details I may have missed (I tried touch on everything relevant that I could find references for). Remember to provide a source for anything you wish to add and not include any orginal research. If you ever feel like it, we could collaborate on any Pennsylvania Railroad locomotives, as there are still a bunch in the Railroad Museum of Pennsylvania that are listed on the National Register of Historic Places that still need articles. Thanks, Niagara ^{Don't give up the ship} 18:55, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PRR 6755

Will anyone help me, finish the article on Pennsylvania Railroad 6755? It's entitled, "PRR 6755", any help would be appreciated.

This document has some info on 6755 that might be of help. Niagara ^{Don't give up the ship} 01:55, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Union Pacific 2010

I am surprised that no one has made an article for Union Pacific 2010, the Boy Scout Heritage Unit. That unit deserves an article too.

Atglen and Susquehanna Branch

Can someone please upload some images to the article?

Nomination of Tuscan red for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tuscan red is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuscan red until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bobrayner (talk) 17:54, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of From Bed to Worse (The Ant and the Aardvark)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on From Bed to Worse (The Ant and the Aardvark), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:11, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pennsylvania Railroad 7048

The article Pennsylvania Railroad 7048 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Exists, but doesn't meet WP:N.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 08:52, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of New York Central 3001 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New York Central 3001 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New York Central 3001 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:16, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Pennsylvania Railroad 4876

Pennsylvania Railroad 4876 has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 03:18, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]