Jump to content

User talk:TheEmbodimentOfResponsibility

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Overlinking

[edit]

Please see WP:OVERLINK for guidelines regarding linking - the links you're adding to Newt Gingrich are excessive by any standard, and appear to be vandalism. Please stop it - we're here to write an encyclopedia, not play politics. Tvoz/talk 02:57, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Newt Gingrich. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Again, please stop it. Tvoz/talk 03:32, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Marvin Hagler

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Marvelous Marvin Hagler. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SteveO (talk) 14:08, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

[edit]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Welcome Back, Kotter. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. rv non-improvements, hardly minor edits Logical Cowboy (talk) 06:10, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to sex toy. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Logical Cowboy (talk) 06:11, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Marvelous Marvin Hagler, you may be blocked from editing. Logical Cowboy (talk) 06:13, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Welcome Back, Kotter. BigDwiki (talk) 06:16, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, you've said that without even contributing to the article talk! That comes first.TheEmbodimentOfResponsibility (talk) 07:48, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have now blocked you from editing for vandalism and hate speech. I am going to review the rest of your edits, and may increase the block length. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 08:38, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheEmbodimentOfResponsibility (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

Just because you feel you hold the truth, Wikipedia goes by WP:CONSENSUS, and consensus also means that the type of xenophobia your edits exhibit are also not generally welcome. When this block expires, you will be welcome to politely discuss your proposed changes on the article talkpage, but if consensus is that they do not get included, then that's the community decision (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:35, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.