User talk:TheDestroyer10

TheDestroyer10, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi TheDestroyer10! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Naypta (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:26, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Abu al-Hasan al-Ash'ari

added a link pointing to Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaah

Ash'ari

added a link pointing to Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaah

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

:Template:Aqidah

Please discuss your changes to this template on it's talk page. Your edits were undone and you were requested to discuss them on the talk page. Per WP:BRD you need to do that. It is not appropriate to restore your edits again, and it is not appropriate to label them as a minor edit when they are clearly contested. Please read WP:minor. Any Continuation of restoring the content without consensus may be considered edit warring. Please read WP:EDITWAR. Meters (talk) 05:28, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's also not appropriate to label a BRD undo as vandalism as you did here. Meters (talk) 05:40, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:Aqidah. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Since you undid again, here's your edit warring warning. You made the change and it was undone, by more than one editor. You need to discuss it on the talk page, and the article should stay as it originally was untill there is agreement on any needed changes. Meters (talk) 05:32, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BiKaz, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

--Peace world 11:41, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]