User talk:TheCrusadesWereAwesome

November 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nikola Tesla. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. The page pleaded, "PLEASE DO NOT CHANGE NATIONALITY OR ETHNICITY". And yet! Remsense ‥ 论 20:41, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will stand my ground. These are good-faith edits as I'm making it more accurate. He was an ethnic Serb from Croatia and the sources already provided support this. So the label of Croatian Serb is far more accurate than Serbian-American. If consensus is wrong I will oppose it and stand up for the truth. TheCrusadesWereAwesome (talk) 20:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You'll just be blocked for edit warring over the course of your next few reverts, then. Seems wasteful in lieu of following basic instructions to learn why things have been decided the way they are. Remsense ‥ 论 20:46, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are the one edit warring, not me. TheCrusadesWereAwesome (talk) 20:47, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Remsense ‥ 论 20:52, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are just gatekeepers who are spreading disinformation and you're power tripping over your little Wikipedia admin powers. TheCrusadesWereAwesome (talk) 20:55, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nikola Tesla. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Remsense ‥ 论 20:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nikola Tesla. See edit summary - FlightTime (open channel) 20:49, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 20:57, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

November 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen328 (talk) 00:35, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]