User talk:TheBrowniess

This is TheBrowniess's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gauda conquest of Kamarup (May 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gauda conquest of Kamarup and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 08:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheBrowniess! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 08:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Independence Day (Haiti) has been accepted

Independence Day (Haiti), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:34, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Federal Alliance of Eastern Sudan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Federal Alliance of Eastern Sudan. Thanks! Grabup (talk) 08:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wow that was quick. I'll see what I can do in terms of expanding the draft though there doesn't seem to be any more reliable sources left relating to FEAS. Anyways, thanks! TheBrowniess (talk) 09:55, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Grabup! I've expanded the draft a bit, what are your thoughts on it now? Cheers! TheBrowniess (talk) 10:55, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheBrowniess, Sources does’t establishing notablity. Submit it after citing more independent reliable sources, thanks. Grabup (talk) 10:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welp seems this one's a dud as well. All the sources I got were just those four sadly. Thanks anyways for your speedy reviews! TheBrowniess (talk) 11:02, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Federal Alliance of Eastern Sudan (May 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Grabup was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Federal Alliance of Eastern Sudan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Grabup (talk) 10:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Federal Alliance of Eastern Sudan has been accepted

Federal Alliance of Eastern Sudan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

FuzzyMagma (talk) 12:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Operation Distant Runner has been accepted

Operation Distant Runner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 02:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HELL YEAHHHH TheBrowniess (talk) 02:53, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Coup attempt articles

Hey, I love what you're doing with the creation of pages regarding early 2000's and 2010's coup attempts. However, could you add infoboxes to the articles so the information looks more streamlined and easier to digest at a glance? Jebiguess (talk) 23:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'll see what I can do. TheBrowniess (talk) 06:21, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jebiguess Done. Forgive me if I made any mistakes, I'm not experienced with making infoboxes after all. TheBrowniess (talk) 07:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you'd like, I'll add some for you and you can check the source code, copy and paste it, and just edit stuff out depending on the context. Otherwise, just go to Template -> Infobox battle (this is generally the best one for coup attempts that turn violent) and then fill in the information. Jebiguess (talk) 00:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I did, pretty much! If you have the time, you can check out the recent changes I made on the articles and review them regarding the infoboxes. TheBrowniess (talk) 16:18, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi TheBrowniess. Thank you for your work on 1963 Ecuadorian coup d'état. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:40, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! G'day to you too mate TheBrowniess (talk) 17:02, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Indonesian articles

please get a handle on adding categories and talkpage tags - it can be done by reverse engineering similar existing articles - thanks. JarrahTree 12:09, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't there a faster way to add them? Bit inconvenient and all 🍫 TheBrowniess (talk) (contribs) 🍫 17:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi TheBrowniess. Thank you for your work on 1957 Colombian coup d'état. Another editor, Clearfrienda, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Clearfrienda}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

C F A 💬 23:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank ya 🍫 TheBrowniess (talk) (contribs) 🍫 23:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Committee of Nine (Indonesia)

An article that you have been involved in editing—Committee of Nine (Indonesia)—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Ckfasdf (talk) 21:59, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Borobudur

The ref Institutional Repository UNS does not go anywhere, and the usage of all caps is strongly discouraged in english wikipedia, even if it is how a reference might appear - see WP:SHOUTING. Thanks JarrahTree 00:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I'll make sure not to do that again! As for the reference, I can't get the URL for it because when I click on it, it doesn't open a webpage. Instead, it automatically starts downloading a PDF document. Dunno how to fix that. 🍫 TheBrowniess (talk) (contribs) 🍫 01:29, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

there is a way of referencing pdfs I have forgotten, I'll get back to it over the weekend or after JarrahTree 09:41, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alrighty thanks mate 🍫 TheBrowniess (talk) (contribs) 🍫 10:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello TheBrowniess! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Article Reviews, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:23, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]