User talk:Thatonewikipediadude

Welcome!

Hello, Tejas mohan vats, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:42, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Caste

Per our WP:CASTEID policy, caste in a biographical article, especially living individuals can only be mentioned if they have self-identified it (interview, tweet, etc). That is, they should mention in first person something like "I belong to XYZ-caste". Hope it helps. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:46, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

so the thousands and thousands of websites,articles,videos,news channels telling his caste is not enough for you? Tejas mohan vats (talk) 19:49, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not for me, but the Wikipedia community. That's the consensus. If you want castes to be mentioned in biographies, find interviews of the subjects where they explicitly mention it. Perhaps you need to read the WP:CASTEID policy/consensus again, if not already. -Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Hello, I'm Fathoms Below. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User:Tejas mohan vats have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Fathoms Below (talk) 20:13, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Surajbhan Singh. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not change the name of the subjects without official sources in support. And caste requires self-identification in an interview for a living person per WP:CASTEID. So refrain from adding it again and again. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:15, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Raja Dham Dev Rao, you may be blocked from editing. —Eyer (he/him) If you reply, add {{reply to|Eyer}} to your message. 15:36, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i just wrote the truth,a group of people are continuously exploiting kam dev misir and dham dev misir page.It appears you are biased with them. Thatonewikipediadude (talk) 15:40, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Anjana Om Kashyap. Caste requires self-identification in an interview for a living person per WP:CASTEID and atleast a source mentioning it in the case of a dead person. Stop adding caste in articles again and again without fulfilling these criteria. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:26, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]