User talk:Thainguyencc

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the "sandbox" rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Hell In A Bucket (talk) 13:27, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 13:34, 26 November 2013 (UTC) Please see [[1]] Hell In A Bucket (talk) 13:54, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Vietnamese language

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Vietnamese language. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:Thainguyencc reported by User:Hell in a Bucket (Result: 48 hours). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 20:24, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have restarted the 48-hour AN3 block due to the evasion reported at ANI (see below). EdJohnston (talk) 17:24, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ani

Please see [[2]] Hell In A Bucket (talk) 10:46, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. I am reporting you to the edit war board again for continuing edit warring and personal attacks including assumptions of bad faith. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:38, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Thainguyencc reported by User:Hell in a Bucket (Result: ). Thank you. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:42, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring, as you did at Vietnamese language. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

You resumed the edit war at Vietnamese language right after expiry of your previous block. This block can be lifted by any admin if they are convinced that you have changed your mind about edit warring. EdJohnston (talk) 15:48, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thainguyencc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I added ^{[page needed]}, it's very normal, but User:Kwamikagami and User:Hell in a Bucket reverted my edit. Thainguyencc (talk) 15:51, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have indeed described your edit war; we're looking for some recognition of why your approach was wrong, and a comprehensive description of how you will avoid such disruptive editing in the future. Kuru (talk) 15:56, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You also added "(missing date)" right after the date.

Ethnologue does not have page numbers, which you would have known if you'd actually tried checking the source, or discussing it on the talk page. — kwami (talk) 15:54, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Because this map is "missing date", What is the link?. Kwamikagami is truly the man reverted without talk --Thainguyencc (talk) 15:58, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And I think Hell in a Bucket is Kwamikagami's sock puppet.--Thainguyencc (talk) 16:01, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thainguyencc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I need a page and add {{page needed}}, but Kwamikagami reverted my edit without talk. How many pages or links in "Ethnologue (2009, 2013)"? Thainguyencc (talk) 16:14, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 16:44, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Thainguyencc reported by User:Hell in a Bucket (Result: ). Thank you. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:25, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for resuming edit warring after expiration of last block with only one intervening edit, as you did at Vietnamese language. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 17:35, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]