User talk:Tfit780

Reply

If you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it. Please don't write about yourself, your friends or relatives and read the guidance below:

When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.

The only part of your text that had a source was Stirling Cooper (born March 4, 1987), is an award winning adult film star, the rest is entirely unsourced. If you claim something, you must verify it with independent third-party sources
The parts of the notability criteria linked above that matter are this and this. We can verify that he won an award, but not that he had significant roles in multiple film, there are no refs or indications that he had lead roles

You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

Opinions presented as facts include Widely known... most controversial... he helps men improve their sex lives... one of the most popular male talents.

There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Not reasons for deletion, but you didn't name the award in your text, your ref was an unformatted url, and you had no wikilinks, such as Melbourne, Australia or Hustler, Also , having social media accounts isn't notable unless they have been covered in mainstream media.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. If you are writing about yourself, or someone you know as a friend, colleague, client, employer or relative, you have a conflict of interest, and you must disclose the nature of that COI. Jimfbleak - talk to me?

AfC notification: Draft:Stirling Cooper has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Stirling Cooper. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:00, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stirling Cooper (August 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Only plausibly reliable, non-trivial coverage cited is the OK! magazine article. The YouTube video is a primary source and it is self-published, unacceptable as a reliable source. Award rosters do not constitute significant coverage and the sources are low quality.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stirling Cooper and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

• Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tfit780! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Stirling Cooper

Hello, Tfit780. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stirling Cooper, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:05, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]