User talk:Tfeaster

Welcome

Hello, Tfeaster, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:30, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:31, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Feaster

This is a disambiguation page, listing related articles. I've raised some concerns at Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation#Should dab pages have infoboxes?. It should follow our guidelines at WP:DAB and MOS:DAB. The MOS (manual of style) page says " In brief, the pages should contain only disambiguation content". It's a dab page because it isn't just a surname page, it has a place on it. Even if it were a surname page, you'd still need links to articles. I don't think there's any chance of an article for the South Carolina John Feater, see WP:People. The 'notes' don't belong there at all, nor does the infobox. Your link to Vassy is to another dab page, we don't have an article on this surname, nor any evidence that Feaster is related to it. Dougweller (talk) 15:25, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Feaster has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 15:26, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not assume ownership of articles such as Feaster. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. Also, please see WP:COI, WP:BRD, WP:CITE, WP:NOT, WP:D, and WP:MOSDAB. -- JHunterJ (talk) 16:02, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop assuming ownership of articles such as Feaster. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please revert to the encyclopedic version. Wikipedia is also not a webhost. No one is disputing the truth of your additions, just their appropriateness to a general encyclopedia. -- JHunterJ (talk) 16:22, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Feaster. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please understand, if within 24 hours you replace the removed material again, or remove what anyone else has added, you will be blocked. In other words, you mustn't edit this article again for about 23 hours. Dougweller (talk) 17:15, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

consolidated from User talk:JHunterJ#Feaster

Hi JHunterJ, Alright, I want to put as much info. as I can about the Feasters and you want to conform. Could We compromise? Can I start up a new page about the Feaster Family?

Sincerely, TFeaster

As much information as conforms to the five pillars (WP:PILLARS), yes, we can compromise. No, you probably can't set up a new page on Wikipedia about the Feaster family (WP:NOTDIRECTORY -- Wikipedia is not a genealogical reference) -- Feaster, an entry about the surname, is the appropriate place for the appropriate information. (You could set up a new page on a genealogy site about the Feaster family. http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.feaster/mb.ashx , for example.) The information on Wikipedia needs to be encyclopedic, which means notable and verifiable in reliable sources, not original research. -- JHunterJ (talk) 17:19, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't say that it's "Original Research", as you can see, the University of South Carolina is a source for much of the information. Also, I will add a book for one of the sources.

Please (a) stop reverting the article and (b) use the talk page to propose your changes. Understand that there may be elements of Wikipedia that your are still unfamiliar with. -- JHunterJ (talk) 01:20, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for For a disruptive edits, ownership issues, and edit warring at Feaster. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JHunterJ (talk) 00:04, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Let's be clear, it's my family, I don't care about the "5 Pillars" or other stuff, I'm going to make my family history known when possible.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Tfeaster (talk • contribs) 00:37, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for Continued disruption and stated intention to ignore the pillars. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JHunterJ (talk) 02:16, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hope that you will reconsider the five pillars. After the week is up, please use the Talk:Feaster page to propose your changes. -- JHunterJ (talk) 02:16, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I never explicitly stated and intent to "ignore the pillars", how you interpret that is your thing, and most certainly not my problem, maybe you should reconsider and learn the meaning of "stated intention", also, I know bypasses (how you interpret this is your opinion).

Wow, you actually blocked me indefinitely, all for some dispute over my family's page, don't you two (Dougweller and JHunterJ) have better stuff to do? Maybe get a wife or girlfriend. I'll just start up some new accounts and edit Feaster with those. (don't ever tell me about my family you J.O.s)

Original research

You really must read WP:NOR and WP:VERIFY before you start editing again. You may know your family, but we need reliable sources (also see WP:RS and these don't include House of Names, personal websites, etc. Please read the other guidelines and policies you've been asked to read. We welcome your input, but basically this is an encyclopedia built on what reliable sources (by our criteria) have to say about a subject that is notable (again by our criteria). We also have style guidelines, et. And read WP:COI again if you haven't read it yet. Dougweller (talk) 17:28, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, Let me make my own page about the Feaster Family.

December 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing. You were originally blocked for a week. Your edits to make it appear that it was only a one day block strongly suggest that you are not here to contribute to the project. After discussion with the Admin who originally blocked you, I'm extending your block to indefinite. You can of course appeal.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 20:50, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tfeaster (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I should be allowed to edit my family's page because it's about me, not the J.O.s (Stands for Jerk Off) Tfeaster (talk) 22:09, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Favonian (talk) 22:16, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You're not editing about your family, you're editing an article about a last name. When your family members become notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia, somebody else will write about them using third party reliable sources. I'm not sure what the J.O. part is about - maybe you'd care to elaborate (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 22:19, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]