User talk:TexasRanger6

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, If you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

Thank you.

-- The Anome (talk) 14:23, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Warwick Economics Summit (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EggOfReason was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Warwick Economics Summit and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Warwick Economics Summit, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

–eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 18:27, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WESWarwick! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! –eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 18:27, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

TexasRanger6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

TexasRanger6 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Username removed to not represent organisation WESWarwick (talk) 15:18, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Renamed and unblocked. Please note you have been violating WP:COI. Please refrain from any more editing about the Warwick Economics Summit to avoid an immediate reblock. You are welcome to contribute in subject areas for which you do not have a conflict of interest. Yamla (talk) 15:23, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You were clearly warned about your conflict of interest and decided to ignore the warning. You've continued to use Wikipedia to violate WP:PROMO with regard to the Warwick Economics Summit. As such, this is the end of the line. You are blocked indefinitely. --Yamla (talk) 16:18, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was under the impression that I would be able to edit the article page if I amended my user name and followed the guidelines on the wiki page regarding article neutrality and citations. I misunderstood that this would also include not editing the article at all but the instructions were unclear, when the article was rejected it clearly stated I could make the necessary changes and then resubmit it. For this reason, I can create a new account to resubmit my article. I believe the article itself, Warwick Economics Summit, is very similar to the article of St Gallen Symposium, and thus should be accepted to the page with necessary edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TexasRanger6 (talk • contribs)

I said, "Please refrain from any more editing about the Warwick Economics Summit to avoid an immediate reblock." Are you claiming those instructions were somehow unclear?!? And no, you are not to create a new account. That would be a violation of WP:EVADE and WP:SOCK. Until this account is unblocked, you are not permitted to edit. If your only goal is to write about the Warwick Economics Summit, this is the end of the line. If instead you wish to write about something for which you have no conflict of interest, convince us you understand WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO and tell us what you'll write about instead. --Yamla (talk) 21:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Your addition to Draft:Warwick Economics Summit has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

This user has engaged in block evasion in December, 2019 to continue violating WP:COI and WP:PROMO. --Yamla (talk) 11:20, 4 December 2019 (UTC) Please see Casablancas17 (talk · contribs)-- Deep fried okra 04:30, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS ticket 28136

has been closed-- Deep fried okra 04:35, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TexasRanger6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here TexasRanger6 (talk) 17:18, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. 331dot (talk) 20:53, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I was asked by Wikipedia administrator Yamia to post my unblock reason in this talk page, having been blocked on a different account (Casablancas17). I cannot currently edit this talk page as I have been blocked, so was hoping I can be unblocked on this page. Correction, I can now edit this page, my bad.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TexasRanger6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My Wikipedia Account (Casablancas17) was blocked due to being a 'sockpuppet' of TexasRanger6 by Moderator Yamia. I initially appealed the block on my new account Casablancas17, but was informed I should appeal the block on my original account.

IMPORTANT NOTE: I am not appealing a charge of creating another account, but I am appealing the initial reason for my block (a perceived conflict of interest) as I do not have a conflict of interest, and asking that given this reason, I be allowed to edit the page Warwick Economics Summit. The full explanation, which should highlight why I both do not have a conflict of interest with the summit despite the initial perceived reason and was also not attempting to violate Wikipedia policies for malicious intent or spam purposes, are fully outlined below.

Whilst it is true that I created an alternate account when my initial account (TexasRanger6) was blocked, I do not believe this block is fair or logical. Below is the summary of events which have transpired so far:

1. My initial Wikipedia page (the first I have ever created) 'Warwick Economics Summit' was declined due to not meeting Wikipedia' criteria of neutrality. As this was my first Wikipedia article, I was not fully aware of these criteria before submitting my draft. My account was also blocked due to a perceived conflict of interest in the name (WESWarwick, changed to TexasRanger6).

2. I created a new account Casablancas17 and edited the Wikipedia article Warwick Economics Summit, fully adhering to Wikipedia's declared criteria of neutrality, using a range of independent sources to support the article and straying away from opinions. Despite my article being very similar to 'The St Gallen Economics Symposium' a Wikipedia article which was allowed, my article was blocked.

3. My account Casablancas17 was blocked by Yamia for sock puppetry. (I want to clarify I am not casting judgement on this action, but just want to lay out the facts so far).

To clarify my relation to the Warwick Economics Summit- I am a former student at the University of Warwick (attended 15 years ago), but I am not in any way affiliated with the Warwick Economics Summit, which is an entirely separate entity (running entirely separately from the university). I am not paid for by WES, nor do I work on its organisational side. I am acting solely as an individual and had initially (mistakenly) created the account with the name ‘WESWarwick’ because I intended to create. edit the page Warwick Economics Summit as my first article edit. (This was before I was fully aware of Wikipedia policies regarding usernames. I would be happy to fully submit an article to a more experienced editor to demonstrate that my article has no editorial bias or promotional language.

I admit at the time, I had not fully informed myself of Wikipedia’s conflict of interest criteria fully, however having read this document, it appears that the main contention is a perceived lack of honesty regarding affiliations i may have when creating the account. Yes, I attended the University of Warwick over 15 years ago (prior to the establishment of the Economics Summit), but I am in no way nor have ever been affiliated with the faculty or organisational capacity of the Warwick Economics Summit which I believe is the main source of contention. I am acting solely as an individual and had initially (mistakenly) created the account with the name ‘WESWarwick’ because I intended to create. edit the page Warwick Economics Summit as my first article edit. (This was before I was fully aware of Wikipedia policies regarding usernames.

Furthermore, moderator Yamia has made it clear, by blocking my talk page on the page for Casablancas17- that I should post these comments here (on the talk page for the user name TexasRanger6) because here it will be apparent that I was told in no uncertain terms not to set up another account. This implies that I was trying to circumvent the gaze of Wikipedia moderation by posting from a separate account when this had not been my honest intention.

I admit, in retrospect, it appears to be clear that I should not create a new account, however, I had only intended to create an account to make clear I was not connected to the Warwick Economics Summit when making edits- nor for intentional malicious intent.

Moreover, this fact (that I should not create another account) was unclear to me at the time based on evidence directly presented in this talk page- for example, at the top of this user/talk page, I quote ‘Wikipedia…has a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group….promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose..you may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username that complies with our username policy.’

The above text seems to undeniably state that provided I do not promotionally edit or write with a conflict of interest (i.e. a personal or business connection to a university), I would be allowed to create a new account or alternatively proceed with edits to pages like the Warwick Economics Summit on my original account, which I have no conflict of interest with beyond the past student status as stated above) and proceed with edits as normal.

This seems to have attracted the attention of moderator Yamia, who blocked my account indefinitely after accusing me of sockpuppetry/skirting username blocks for doing this. I recognise my mistakes in terms of miscommunication and misunderstanding of Wikipedia guidelines are entirely my own fault, but the above reasoning should highlight that I was not intending to contradict Wikipedia policy.

Regarding copyright issues on the images, which moderator Yamia pointed out on the talk page for username ‘Casablancas17), I want to clarify that in researching my article for submission, I separately made contact with the Warwick Economics Summit, solely to seek permission to use images from the summit posted on their website for the article, and was granted permission to post these images onto Wikimedia commons. Thus, even though I have posted these images to the site, this does not in any way signify a conflict of interest which should create a cause for concern regarding the article posting nor a copyright issue which could cause the article to be put into question.

I believe my article and account is being repeatedly rejected due to this initial issue of perceived 'conflict of interest' despite the fact I am not connected to WES. I recognise the mistakes I have made due to misunderstandings of Wikipedia policy, but I am not involved in any way with the Warwick Economics Summit organisation and must object to false perceived accusations of conflict of interest which are simply not there.

I would be fully prepared to submit my article for review by a more experienced moderator, should either one of my accounts (TexasRanger6) or (Casablancas17) be unblocked.

I believe the heart of the issue is related to potential sources of bias in the article and objectivity which may be undermined if there is a conflict of interest. Once more, I am not connected to the Warwick Economics Summit- the original account name was created because I intended to edit the article relating to the topic, not because I have a formal link to this organisation. I am not paid by WES.

Secondly, I had fully improved the article 'Warwick Economics Summit' in line with Wiki guidelines and there is no evident bias in the article content itself (note: the latest version of the article has been deleted so I cannot post it here, and I accept that the 1st version was questionable - but as this was my 1st Wikipedia article this is understandable. I believe my article content (which should be the heart of any argument) is neutral and well-cited, hence I would like to dispute the article deletion and my account block.

I am not intending to spam or violate any other Wikipedia policies.

Finally, I would like to say that I do not understand the seemingly paradoxical logic of the moderation process in this entire article posting process. I have been first informed that my article was blocked because it failed to meet the standards of Wikipedia- so I improved it. I was then informed that due to a perceived conflict of interest in my name- which is not true in reality- I must not edit the article with my current username- so I changed my name. I continued to make edits to the article Warwick Economics Summit, under the belief the name change was the main source of contention- but was informed that I shouldn’t be editing the article at all. (Note- I recognise errors made due to misunderstanding of Wikipedia policy, but the crux of the issue, a conflict of interest, is fundamentally not true. On principle, I must object to this characterisation).

I do not understand why I, someone not connected to the Warwick Economics Summit organisation in any way, nor paid by WES, should not be able to edit the Warwick Economics Summit article purely on the basis of a single initial fault with my username representing a nonexistent conflict of interest. By this reasoning- no one would be able to edit the page 'Warwick Economics Summit' at all, as any attempts to edit the source material from an entirely separate accounts are viewed as sockpuppetry and neither is editing the page with the original account- despite the fact that 1. the article topic (Warwick Economics Summit) is a valid subject of an article and 2. is content-wise similar in tone and subject-matter to another student-run summit- the St Gallen Symposium- which has been approved. Presumably, someone was able to edit that page successfully. Note once more, I am not disputing the fact I created another account, which I recognise now was a mistake made in error due to misunderstanding of Wikipedia policy, but the more important point, that the crux of the argument ( a conflict of interest), is not true.

I understand and accept that Wikipedia places a very high standard on its articles to prevent fraud, promotional content, etc, but I believe I should at least be granted the chance to submit a revised draft of this article Warwick Economics Summit to a more experienced moderators as I do not have a formal conflict of interest (not paid for or employed by the Warwick Economics summit) and believe my article (and future articles beyond this one) are worthy of submission.

TexasRanger6 (talk) 18:12, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This request is far too long. Please make a shorter, concise request. 331dot (talk) 20:54, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TexasRanger6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My Wikipedia Account (Casablancas17) was blocked due to being a 'sockpuppet' of TexasRanger6 by Moderator Yamia. I initially appealed the block on my new account Casablancas17 but was informed I should appeal the block on my original account. The full timeline of events is on a previous unblock request which was declined for being too long. IMPORTANT NOTE: I am not appealing a charge of creating another account, but I am appealing the initial reason for my block (a perceived conflict of interest) as I do not have a conflict of interest. I believe I should be unblocked as the crux of the argument, that I have a conflict of interest with the Warwick Economics Summit, is not valid. To clarify my relation to the Warwick Economics Summit- I am a former student at the University of Warwick (attended 15 years ago), but I am not in any way affiliated with the Warwick Economics Summit, which is an entirely separate entity (running entirely separately from the university). I am not paid for by WES, nor do I work on its organisational side. I am acting solely as an individual and had initially (mistakenly) created the account with the name ‘WESWarwick’ because I intended to edit the page Warwick Economics Summit as my first article edit. (This was before I was fully aware of Wikipedia policies regarding usernames.) Whilst it is true that I had previously created an alternate account when my initial account (TexasRanger6) was blocked, this was not something done out of malicious intent and based out of misunderstanding of Wikipedia policy. I was not attempting to circumvent Wikipedia moderation by posting from a separate account. I had only initially created a new account to make it clear I was not connected to the Warwick Economics Summit. I had previously believed this was acceptable as the talk page mentions 'you may simply create a new account although promotional editing is not acceptable regardless . of the username you choose'. I had believed that, provided I amend my username and not engage in promotional editing, my new username would be acceptable. I now realise this is not the case, but the original block on my account due to a conflict of interest was not valid. Regarding copyright issues, highlighted by admin Yamia, I want to clarify that in researching my article for submission, I separately made contact with the Warwick Economics Summit, solely to seek permission to use images from the summit posted on their website for the article, and was granted permission to post these images onto Wikimedia commons- this does not constitute a cause for concern. The issue has been discussed on Wikimedia and all the files have been approved following authorisation by the Warwick Economics Summit that the files can be used in the common domain. (see Wikimedia ticket #2019123010005738.) I would be happy to fully submit an article to a more experienced editor to demonstrate that my article has no editorial bias or promotional language. I understand and accept that Wikipedia places a very high standard on its articles to prevent fraud, promotional content, etc. TexasRanger6 (talk) 23:23, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline as stale only; you are free to make a new request that is more persuasive. 331dot (talk) 12:13, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I wanted to check whether the above message had been read and whether there had been any update? To clarify, all copyright issues have been resolved as highlighted above (and in Wikimedia ticket #2019123010005738.)

Draft:Warwick Economics Summit concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Warwick Economics Summit, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Warwick Economics Summit

Hello, TexasRanger6. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Warwick Economics Summit".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:13, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]