User talk:Testoffate86

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Sthacker21 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sthacker21. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

--Blablubbs (talk) 00:36, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Testoffate86 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

All right! You got me! I am Sthacker21! Yeah, I made other usernames to stay under the radar. I get it, yet I didn't understand at the time the editing I have done was considered disruptive! I still feel that reverting some of my edits just because I was blocked was completely unnecessary especially when the information I provided was completely accurate, sock or no sock. Testoffate86 (talk) 05:24, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you want your edits to stand, you need to make them when you are not blocked. You will need to request unblock from your original account, we don't unblock sock accounts. Once there, you will probably be asked to wait six months to show us that you can abide by policies as a show of good faith. 331dot (talk) 09:23, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.