Jump to content

User talk:Teslawlo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Teslawlo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! J Milburn (talk) 14:59, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for being bold and putting the article up for Good Article candidacy. Best of luck with it! I have left some suggested improvements on the article's Talk page. MartinPoulter (talk) 15:51, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a review. Would be great to have your and your colleagues' further input to get it through the last few steps to GA standard. The article is getting a lot more hits since you've been working on it: it's being read about 450 times per day now. MartinPoulter (talk) 10:54, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Social loafing Ringelmann experiment chart

[edit]

I was fascinated by the chart you made for the Social loafing article:

I would love to see either another chart, or additional bars that show the total amount of force. It appears to me that it requires 8 people in a team to match the effort of only 4 individuals working alone! The chart currently shows a linear decline in individual effort, and I'm curious if the increasing group strength also appears linear, or if it's more or less than linear. In other words, is there a point of diminishing returns? From that information, we could speculate and extrapolate: If the group were increased to 16 people, would the individual effort add up to being nearly equal to 8 individuals? And similar questions...

Badon (talk) 07:46, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]