User talk:Tervealbeeps

Welcome!

Hello, Tervealbeeps, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Viriditas (talk) 09:28, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Email

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

how to email Wikipedia Users

See Wikipedia:Emailing users. Viriditas (talk) 09:28, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can email Wikipedia users by Special:EmailUser. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 09:25, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

register an account and still did not find this feature on your account User talk--Tervealbeeps (talk) 09:51, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's there. You need to click on "Tools" and then "Email this user". Or simply follow the directions above. Viriditas (talk) 09:59, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Does this really work

Yes, it works. Viriditas (talk) 09:59, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

reply to this email--Tervealbeeps (talk) 10:35, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would prefer to keep the discussion on Wikipedia. Viriditas (talk) 10:38, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes this keep the discussion on Wikipedia. i need to "TEST TEST" Does this really work " You need to reply to this email--Tervealbeeps (talk) 03:32, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, I do not "need" to do anything. Yes, I received your email. Viriditas (talk) 03:54, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i need to "TEST TEST" email reply to this email find this feature TEST" really work "--Tervealbeeps (talk) 04:00, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to test it somewhere else. I won't be replying. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 04:07, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot

Hi Tervealbeeps! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:40, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

how to report Wikipedia Users--Tervealbeeps (talk) 03:39, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you want to do that? Viriditas (talk) 03:55, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

how to report Wikipedia Users as a SPAM and blocked from editing--Tervealbeeps (talk) 03:41, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you mean. Viriditas (talk) 03:55, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

nonsense claimed!!! STOP further irrelevant notices!!!--Tervealbeeps (talk) 03:50, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The Teahouse notice is quite relevant, if you are a new user. Viriditas (talk) 03:55, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ... discospinster _talk 03:57, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

tell this "Do not edit war even if you believe you are right."to yourself!!! nonsense claimed!!!--Tervealbeeps (talk) 04:03, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tervealbeeps, I think everyone would agree with you that the page needs to be shortened and split into different articles, but removing the headings isn't the way to go about doing it. In fact, the headings are actually placeholders for where to split the article. Viriditas (talk) 04:06, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

United States headings isn't the way anything to do Wth Nuclear program of Iran!!!--Tervealbeeps (talk) 04:10, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Nuclear program of Iran. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ... discospinster _talk 04:10, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tervealbeeps (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

nonsense fabrications by SPAM discospinster sock of Viriditas (talk)editing Do not violates rights can be edit Please check Edit summary!!! Please check https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Nuclear_program_of_Iran&action=history discospinster sock of Viriditas Tervealbeeps (talk) 04:14, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Mr.Z-man 05:48, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've blocked you indefinitely for disruptive editing. You're WP:CIR, WP:NOTHERE, or trolling. I've also revoked your talk page access because of your abuse. Read WP:GAB if you wish to appeal.--Bbb23 (talk) 04:40, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]