User talk:Teoph
Hi there, 189.6.238.83! Do not add any nazi revisionist sources, thank you! Antique Rose (talk) 22:46, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]![]() |
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Teoph for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. --GoodDamon 23:02, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
"Posen Speech" page and "Heinrich Himmler" page
[edit]User "165.189.169.190, Antique_Rose, AniMate, Jayjg" is deleting my contribution about Heinrich Himmler´s Posen Speech ceaselessly and recently has used Twinkle to block me as vandalism because I pointed to Arthur Butz book as the source of information I have from IMT documents. Please, it´s not possible that someone acts in such a way in this "free" encyclopedia. If information has to come only from "certain" accepted sources, this is a biased "free" encyclopedia.
Thank you
- No, information has to come from "certain" accepted sources in order to keep it free from bias. Wikipedia has very strict rules about reliable sources for information. If a source doesn't match that criteria -- and Arthur Butz isn't recognized by any mainstream media as an expert on the holocaust -- then that source can't be used. It's that simple. If we could use any source at all, then I could write up a web page claiming that Mars is made entirely out of chocolate, then cite my own web page on Wikipedia. --GoodDamon 00:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
This is the only link I have from IMT documents volume 13, since they are not available on the internet. So, "Posen Speech" will remain very incomplete and erroneous because Wikipedia doesn´t accept a Book that is not mainstream and that refers to official documents. This is a biased information that doesn't allow discussion and doesn't do any good for the wealth of information and compromise with truth.
Thank you
- Forgive me for being harsh, but get over it. Either cite the documents you're referring to directly -- are they available in a library? -- or find a different, reliable source for your edits. I honestly doubt you will; no reliable source will touch Nazi propaganda with a ten-foot pole. But if you do, and incorporate an edit that is both neutral in tone and informative, it will be examined much more closely than the Holocaust-denier you've been trying to insert. --GoodDamon 00:42, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Ok, thank you for your comprehension, I will try to find copies of the originals.
You won´t accept any contempt of your truth. I´m going to Metapedia and transfer my contribution to "metallurgy" to Metapedia. Keep it with your biased trash wikipedia. You can also unblock Heinrich Himmler´s page. That was only to know how biased the administrators of this site are. And, please, don't go to Metapedia to impose your truth and delete other´s contributions because they are not mainstream! And you probably will do this, unfortunately I think you will always try to chase whoever dares your partiality.
Posen speech
[edit]Posen speech
[edit]Copied from here I have some concerns about your edits to entry on the Posen speech. I believe that you are operating threee sockpuppets in order to insert your point of view. I've raised concerns about you and Teoph (talk · contribs), Johanneskirchner (talk · contribs), and Earlybegin (talk · contribs) at WP:AN/I#Posen speech. AniMate 23:34, 4 February 2008 (UTC)