User talk:Tenzinwestcoast

Welcome!

Hello, Tenzinwestcoast, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 15:36, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dorje Shugden controversy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

of this issue as you can see below. ''The Shugden affair: Origins of a Controversy (Part II)''] by [[Geshe]] Georges Dreyfus, retrieved Feb. 28, 2014.</ref> [[Georges Dreyfus|Dreyfus]] says "

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:36, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dorje Shugden may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

views of this issue as you can see below.''The Shugden affair: Origins of a Controversy (Part I)''] by [[Geshe]] Georges Dreyfus, retrieved Feb. 16, 2014.</ref><ref name="DreyfusPart2">[http://www.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:08, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Location

Are you editing from the same location as Truthsayer62?Heicth (talk) 21:39, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Heicth (talk) 22:11, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Minor" edits

Hi, Tenzinwestcoast. Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". But you have marked every one of your edits "minor", even though they are not minor at all as Wikipedia defines it. Thank you.Bishonen | talk 22:19, 30 April 2014 (UTC).[reply]

May 2014

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:04, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tenzinwestcoast (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am new here and am not clear why I was blocked when replacing clearly inflammatory text that insults a whole group of religious people as worshiping an angry spirit. That is not balanced data.

Decline reason:

You were blocked by User:Atama for being pretty obviously a returning sockpuppet of a blocked editor attempting to evade that block, and I see no reason why this judgement would be in error, as your contributions indicate you are one and the same pretty strongly. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:07, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.