Jump to content

User talk:TenTonParasol/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009

[edit]

Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.


The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 45 24 November 2008 About the Signpost
From the editor: 200th issue 
ArbCom elections: Candidate profiles News and notes: Fundraiser, milestones 
Wikipedia in the news Dispatches: Featured article writers — the inside view 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Volume 4, Issue 46 1 December 2008 About the Signpost
ArbCom elections: Elections open Wikipedia in the news 
WikiProject Report: WikiProject Solar System Features and admins 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Volume 5, Issue 1 3 January 2009 About the Signpost
From the editor: Getting back on track 
ArbCom elections: 10 arbitrators appointed Virgin Killer page blocked, unblocked in UK 
Editing statistics show decline in participation Wikipedia drug coverage compared to Medscape, found wanting 
News and notes: Fundraising success and other developments Dispatches: Featured list writers 
Wikipedia in the news WikiProject Report: WikiProject Ice Hockey 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kuroshitsuji

[edit]

I'm going to look at the two articles and get a little more insight as to what is going on. You are right though, fancruft can be a REAL pain to deal with, especially in fiction articles. If you want example of some really rough fancruft, look at a few of the articles on the WWE and it's wrestlers. I can understand your frustration too, as no one is trying to have a dialogue on the talk page as well. Let me look into it a bit more and I'll see what I can come up with to help you out. You are doing a great job on the articles though, and your quality of work shows through. Wildthing61476 (talk) 03:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem!

[edit]

I'm planning on adding new sources/cleaning it up a bit over the next few weeks. For example, the whole intro needs sources, and the clubs section looks copy-pasted. Wanna help? :) --MgCupcake (talk) 04:42, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 2 10 January 2009 About the Signpost
News and notes:Flagged Revisions and permissions proposals, hoax, milestones Wikipedia in the news 
Dispatches: December themed Main Page Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 19:35, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 3 17 January 2009 About the Signpost
News and notes: New board members, changes at ArbCom Wikipedia in the news 
Dispatches: Featured article writers—the 2008 leaders WikiProject Report: WikiProject Pharmacology 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 23:42, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 4 24 January 2009 About the Signpost
Jimbo requests that developers turn on Flagged Revisions Report on accessing Wikipedia via mobile devices 
News and notes: New chapters, new jobs, new knight and more Wikipedia in the news: Britannica, Kennedy, Byrd not dead yet 
Dispatches: Reviewing featured picture candidates Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered at 04:17, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable)

Images

[edit]

Ugh, this brings in the whole fair use policy into play here. From what you told me, you SHOULD, and I want to emphasize should, be able to upload this photo without a problem. However, keep in mine there is a lot of issue with the fair use policy when it comes to photos, so you might have the photo deleted. I would say post the photo and see what you are told, if anything, and let me know. Wildthing61476 (talk) 13:56, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost, January 31, 2009

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 5 31 January 2009 About the Signpost
Large portion of articles are orphans News and notes: Ogg support, Wikipedia Loves Art, Jimbo honored 
Wikipedia in the news: Flagged Revisions, Internet Explorer add-on Dispatches: In the news 
WikiProject Report: Motto of the Day Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 21:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 6 8 February 2009 About the Signpost
News and notes: Elections, licensing update, and more Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's future, WikiDashboard, and "wiki-snobs" 
Dispatches: April Fools 2009 mainpage WikiProject Report: WikiProject Music 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:08, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

konichiwa

[edit]

So this is how the user talk page works, ive been annoyed for the past few months trying to figure out how this thing works

Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009

[edit]
The Signpost
Volume 5, Issue 7
Weekly Delivery
2009-02-16

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist.
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 06:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ER

[edit]

I noticed that you edit at WP:ER, and I ask if you could give your input in this discussion to revamp the process of ER. Thanks.--TRUCO 19:48, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009

[edit]

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 01:48, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Samurai X trust and Betrayal

[edit]

I'm putting the link back up. The review list is there. Scroll down and look on the left side. It is there. Please examine the page more closely. I don't want to have to correct your mistakes again. Perhaps you don't understand that another title for Samurai X: Trust and Betrayal is Rurouni Kenshin: Reminiscence. If that is a case then understand that both titles represent the same thing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wanabedamned (talk • contribs) 03:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009

[edit]

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:15, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Final Fantasy XIII

[edit]

I'm curious, are you actually challenging the veracity of the single-player status and controllers used for the game? Or are you just throwing {{fact}} tags up solely based on the fact that there are no references? Wiki policy actually states that citations are only required in certain circumstances, and a challenge is the only circumstance the information being tagged in the article meets. Are you suggesting that you don't believe the game is going to be single-player (as is clearly shown in several trailers), or that it won't be using the standard controller inputs on the consoles it will be released for? That sounds a tad bit over the top to me. KhalfaniKhaldun 23:49, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009

[edit]

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:43, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The Wikipedia Signpost  — 16 March 2009

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

D. Gray Man cast

[edit]

I see no point in waiting. The cast was listed on ANN witch already indicates that it is pretty reliable. If the cast dose turn out to be slightly different upon distributaries of the DVD then information can be easily changed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.180.223.10 (talk) 22:24, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 23 March 2009

[edit]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:06, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 30 March 2009

[edit]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:07, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 April 2009

[edit]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:10, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 13 April 2009

[edit]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 16:23, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your thanks

[edit]

It picked me up and I appreciate it . I watchlisted the article in case Hiiamawesome, or anyone else, decides to vandalize it some more. The subject is far from my area of knowledge, but I must says it's a really rather impressive article/list. If only all articles on fictional characters were of such quality. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 21:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Did you know...

[edit]

Hello! I noticed that you've been reviewing a lot of nominations at the DYK suggestions page. Thank you for your help, and I hope you will continue to contribute! As you know, you don't need to be an administrator to review hooks or to move hooks to Next update, so your help is more than welcome.

You may already be familiar with the DYK rules by now, but in case you aren't, you can check out the official rules and the Additional Rules. You may also want to look into some useful tools that can allow you to review nominations more quickly: the Cut & Paste character counter is a helpful JavaScript to calculate the length of hooks, and User:Dr pda/prosesizebytes.js is a script you can install on your own Wikipedia account for more heavy-duty article length calculating.

The best way to learn is by doing, but here is also a quick reference of the things to check for each hook you review:

Quick Reference


Useful Links

Thanks again for your help! I look forward to continuing to work with you at DYK, and if you have any questions don't hesitate to ask me or anyone else at DYK. Now get to reviewing some noms! rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 21:40, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE:DYK nomination of Wench Trouble

[edit]

Thanks! — Hunter Kahn (contribs) 00:08, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 20 April 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:37, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Katsura Hoshino

[edit]

First, kudos for doing a good job on the article. I've been horribly busy lately (finals, ugh...), but I'm done with college at the end of May, so feel free to ask me for a copy-edit job if you feel the article is comprehensive enough. Cheers, — sephiroth bcr (converse) 23:20, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 April 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:20, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 11 May 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 21:55, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unicorn

[edit]

I was looking at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-05-18/In the news, and it mentioned some pics that were taken for wikipedia, and it includes pics of the unicorn hunt. They're probably already uploaded to commons, I'd guess.

Here's one: http://www.flickr.com/photos/shootingbrooklyn/3315609906/ - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 02:59, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 18 May 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 13:00, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 25 May 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:40, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :D

[edit]

Hi itzjustdrama!
Thank you for the kind welcome message... It really helps to have a kind face (or username) when you are new.
I'll make sure to check out those articles sometime!

Carrion Flower (talk) 01:32, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:30, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request to participate in University of Washington survey on tool to quickly understand Wikipedians’ reputations

[edit]

Hello. I'm part of a research group at the University of Washington. In April, we met with Wikipedians to learn what they would like to know about other editors’ history and activities (within Wikipedia) when interacting with them on talk pages. The goal was to gather feedback to help design a tool that could quickly communicate useful information about other Wikipedians. We have now created a few images that we feel represent some of what our participants thought was important. We would appreciate it if you took a few minutes of your time to complete an online survey that investigates whether or not these images would be useful to you. Your quick contribution would be very valuable to our research group and ultimately to Wikipedia. (When finished, the code for this application will be given over to the Wikipedia community to use and/or adjust as they see fit.)

We are particularly interested in feedback from new editors! We want to make sure this tool meets your needs.

Willing to spend a few minutes taking our survey? Click this link.

Please feel free to share the link with other Wikipedians. The more feedback, the better! The survey is completely anonymous and takes less than 10 minutes to complete. All data is used for university research purposes only.

Thank you for your time! If you have any questions about our research or research group, please visit our user page. Commprac01 (talk) 23:15, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Additional details about our research group are available here.

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 15 June 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 11:37, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shueisha

[edit]

The link you added to List of D.Gray-man chapters looks very good. Did you find one that could be use for other shonen jump series such as Reborn! and Gin Tama since their first issue dates are not very specific? Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 16:38, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.Tintor2 (talk) 18:11, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 22 June 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:52, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 29 June 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 01:59, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 July 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:48, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Takeshi Yamamoto

[edit]

Good work with the Yamamoto article. It is looking very good. By the way, I had no idea that you read Reborn!. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 18:50, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 July 2009

[edit]

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 10:02, 28 July 2009 (UTC) [reply]

D. Gray-Man having Adventure, Comedy, and Drama

[edit]

I changed it because Action, Gothic, Fantasy and now Action, Gothic, Supernatural is a terrible overveiw of the genres explored in D.Gray-Man. There are plenty of comedy moments throught the series (Allen and Kanda's realtionship, Allen and Cross' realtionship, Cross hitting on Women, Komui's obsession with Lenalee, etc.) and drama as well (The Fallen One, Allen's "death", Lenlaee asking Allen not to die in that flashback, Lavi's realtionship with the others and his job as a Bookman, Allen and Mana's realtionship, Mana's death, etc.) and I did not put gothic because, in my opinion, gothic referes to shows that are "constantly dark" or "overly dark" for the most part, which D. Gray-Man is not. It has comedy and uplifting drama as much as it has dark themes and sad drama. Also on the religion twist in the show, just because it twists religion does not mean it's gothic, are you going to go throw gothic on Berserk as well? How about throwing it on One Piece because the "heroes" aren't always good and the "villians" aren't always bad? gothic is a mislabeling based off the concept, of course this is all in my opinion, and I will leave it alone, but adventure, comedy, and drama are essential. Oh, and it has adventure because they go to different places, Noah's Ark, the headquarters, other countries during their jobs, all of that is adventure. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DrBoondigga (talk • contribs) 22:21, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note that every shonen manga has comedy. The comedy genre is for series whose focus is comedy. By the way, the limit of genres is three.Tintor2 (talk) 23:01, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 3 August 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:37, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

D.Gray-man latest vol

[edit]

I tried making the summary for volume 18 of the series. Feel free to check and fix it if you want.Tintor2 (talk) 21:12, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I saw here that you are trying to make an Allen Walker article. I found that has been featured in polls from some journals. Although I don't know the page, the sections from the polls from Newtype are named NT Research. Allen was featured in the category Best Male character, but Kanda and Yu have had higher rankings. In the May 2007 issue, he ranked 20th and in the May 2009 issue from Animedia he ranked 19th in the Character Rankings sections. Here is the ref for Newtype "NT Research". Newtype, Issue 6. Kadokawa Shoten. 2007. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help) Animedia, Issue 6. Gakken. 2009. {{cite journal}}: Missing or empty |title= (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help).Tintor2 (talk) 00:41, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. He shared the 20th spot with Light Yagami.Tintor2 (talk) 22:52, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, does the shonen jump archive has the date from Death Note's first appearance in Weekly Shonen Jump? List of Death Note chapters says it first appeared in the issue from December 2003, but that is unsourced.Tintor2 (talk) 00:34, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.Tintor2 (talk) 21:12, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot this: does the issue 24 from 2006 says that is the last chapter from Death Note? The list says the the series ended in May 2006.Tintor2 (talk) 17:32, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 10 August 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:57, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 17 August 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:29, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 24 August 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:49, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Telecommunications Systems Management
Loren D. Estleman
Podunk
Crimson Dawn
Shenlong
Military of Belgium
Madripoor
21 at 33
Amplified spontaneous emission
X-Men Unlimited
Kagrra
Military of the Netherlands
My Neighbors the Yamadas
Winter Days
Surabaya
Hikari (song)
Rosamunde
ComicsOne
Akrotiri and Dhekelia
Cleanup
Jubilee (comics)
Vincent Valentine
New X-Men
Merge
Earth-616
Comic book creator
Thor (Marvel Comics)
Add Sources
Cannonball (comics)
Danger Room
Tommy Oliver
Wikify
Lost Odyssey
Cognitive map
Jack Skellington
Expand
Asteroid M
Beast (comics)
Black Cat (manga)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:07, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 31 August 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 17:26, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Allen Walker

[edit]
Updated DYK query On September 7, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Allen Walker, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

≈ Chamal talk ¤ 17:22, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009

[edit]

Discussion re whether to permit use of all-numeric YYYY-MM-DD format in footnotes

[edit]

FYI -- there is a discussion at [1] as to whether or not to allow the use of the all-numeric YYYY-MM-DD format in footnotes/references.

I'm mentioning it to you in the event that you would like to join in the discussion or follow it, as I recognize that this is an issue you have been interested in in the past. Thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 08:11, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I tried to work some of your thinking regarding non-uniform reference formats into a re-work of the proposal that appears below the comment of supporter # 21.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:48, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009

[edit]

Protecting a page

[edit]

To protect a page is a job for administrator, right?
A page: Battle B-Daman
is heavily vandalised by people.
you know anyone responsible for dealing with that page?
--Frontier95 (talk) 15:40, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009

[edit]


An article whose AFD you participated in before is up at AFD again

[edit]

The article Kemonomimi has been nominated for AFD a second time. I'm contacting every editor who participated in the first one, since if they were interested in it that time, they'd probably want to know the same exact article is being targeted once again. Dream Focus 03:15, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009

[edit]

Orphaned non-free image File:DogsBulletsAndCarnageProtagonists.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DogsBulletsAndCarnageProtagonists.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:50, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TenTonParasol/Archive_2&oldid=1166514432"