User talk:Television Radio

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Red Line (Chicago Transit Authority) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. -down load | sign! 17:40, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

your CTA edits

your repeated injections of poor grammar into the article on CTA rolling stock are counterproductive. The proper grammar is the cars were,not was. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 19:12, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Chicago 'L' rolling stock. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. is placing your version of grammar on these pages really worth it? Wuhwuzdat (talk) 19:16, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Chicago 'L' rolling stock. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 19:20, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chicago 'L' rolling stock, you will be blocked from editing. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 19:22, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Chicago 'L' rolling stock. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 19:23, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruption. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Blueboy 96 19:33, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. token threats 14:36, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Theresa Knott | token threats 14:36, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK in the unlikely event that you were not aware of the earlier block I have reblocked you for 2 more weeks. If you return to your old ways of vandalising our article by deliberately introducing grammar mistakes then you can expect the next block to be permanent. Theresa Knott | token threats 14:39, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Television Radio for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 15:21, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Account disabled

Since you've continued to sock with 69.209.239.205 (talk · contribs), I've disabled this account until you can take the time to explain your actions. Thanks. Kuru ^talk 01:31, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Television Radio for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 16:09, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Television Radio for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 14:55, 9 April 2009 (UTC) Dear Administrator I am sorry for abusing all those accounts and I won't do it again so can I please be unblocked.[reply]

reason here

Dear Kuru I am sorry for abusing all those accounts And I won't do it again so can I please be unblocked.

unblock--ip||1-99.132.139.92.|2=nowiki on second thought a manual request for unblocking is needed here|nowiki|3=Kuru))

Dear Kuru I am sorry for abusing all those accounts am I won't do it again so can i please be unblocked.

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Television Radio for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. — Σ xplicit 20:17, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kuru

Dear Kuru I am sorry for abusing all those accounts and I won't do it again so can I please be unblock. Television Radio

A Manual Request for Unblocking

Dear Kuru This Is My Manual Request for unblocking, I am sorry for abusing all those accounts and I won't do it again and also i would like to change my username. Television Radio.

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Television Radio for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 18:59, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Television Radio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my reason why i should be unblock i am sorry for abusing all those accounts and it won't happen again because i promise to be a good editor to wikipedia meaning i will not vandilize or do any else wrong to wikipedia and if i am unblock i will treat wikipedia with respect like respect all the rules and never disobey the rules and i hope you read this and understand i am sorry and it won't happen again and hopefully you will decide to unblock meTelevision Radio (talk) 20:41, 24 May 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Decline reason:

No. You went too far. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 21:05, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am a non admin, and I fixed your unblock request before you removed it. For future requests, please put {{unblock|your reason here}}

The area that says your reason here is where you put your reason. Don't simply copy and paste the template into a section title, because it ruins the formatting and doesn't work. Please do this next time you request an unblock.— Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 21:58, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Television Radio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason why i should be unblock is i am sorry for all the stuff i done and it won't happen again and i know i went to far and i apoligize for that and if i am unblock i would like to change my username because i do not like this username and i hope you read this and understand i am sorry am it won't happen and this block is no longer necessary because i uderstand what i am block for abusing a lot of accounts and it won't happen again and i will make productive contributions instead.Television Radio (talk) 00:34, 25 May 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Decline reason:

Denied. You went too far. Denied also in your other request at User talk:99.132.131.141. Sockpuppetry is not welcome, nor permitted. Alexf^(talk) 00:47, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Television Radio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my reason why i should be unblock because i read the welcome page and understand the rules of wikipedia and the stuff that i done i am sorry for all that and it won't happen again because if i am unblock i will obey the rules and don't do nothing else wrong and i uderstand what i have been blocked for and i will not continue to cause damage or disruption and also will make useful contributions instead.Television Radio (talk) 01:13, 25 May 2009 (UTC)..[reply]

Decline reason:

Given that you were caught evading your block just hours ago, I doubt the sincerity of your apology--and even then, you've been socking too much for us to assume good faith. And to help you accept your block, I'm turning off your ability to edit your talk page--you'll have to request an unblock via email. Blueboy 96 03:08, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please stop putting your requests in sections.— Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 01:30, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Television Radio for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 20:24, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

another unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Television Radio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my reason why i should be unblock i am sorry for all the stuff i did to wikipedia like i abuse lots of accounts and i am sorry for that and if i am unblock i will not continue to abuse accounts i will just stay with my main account and i will follow all the rules to wikipedia and never disobey the rules and also i will not vandilize pages or do any else wrong to wikipedia because i understand wikipedia is a serious place, it is not the place to play games and it will stay a serious place. And this block is no longer necessary because i understand what i am block for and i will not do it again and i will make productive contributions instead so i hope an administrator reads this and understand i am sorry and it will never happen again and hopefully an administrator will decide to unblock me.

Decline reason:

Looking at your history, I cannot find any evidence that unblocking you would be likely to make the encyclopedia better. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:28, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is bold so that you will see it. Do not put templates in section titles. It does not work.— Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 21:47, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Television Radio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my reason why i should be unblock, can i please be unblock because i am really sorry for all the stuff i did and here is some evidence that unblocking me will make wikipedia better, i will be very helpful to wikipedia meaning i will not cause any damage or do any else wrong and this block is no longer necessary because i understand what i am block for and i will not do it again and i will make productive contributions instead so i hope an administrator reads this and understand i am sorry and it will never happen again because i promise to be a good editor to wikipedia.

Decline reason:

Given your history, and use of socks between your prior requests, declined and page protected to prevent further requests. Step hen 23:48, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.