User talk:Tejas MRCA

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tejas MRCA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

WP:Appeal I commented twice on Talk:Kargil War without creating Wikipedia account, I created my first wiki account and then start discussing on Talk Page. I don't know why I am blocked but I didn't did nothing, just participated in an debate in Talk:Kargil War I live in India and hope administrators will reply here because didn't edited any Article except Indian Army that too reverted vandalism by one user. I just debated in talk page in simple manner. @Admin you can check my contributions. Thanks. Please unblock me so I can participated in the talk page again. Tejas MRCA (talk) 13:04, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We have a rather low tolerance of nationalist POV-pushers, and I find it difficult to believe you were not engaged in sockpuppetry or at least meatpuppetry. Huon (talk) 21:10, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tejas MRCA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir where did I pushed WP:POV ? I Even didn't edited any article except Indian Army that too reverted a user who vandalize the article. Except this I haven't edited any article. I was just debating on RFC Talk:Kargil War and I provided numerous neutral sources to support my claim. And after I got message on my talk page that you are blocked permanently. Sir why these things happens with only those who haven't done anything. Believe me sir, neither I have any other account than this, nor I commented without logging in on Talk:Kargil War if you still not believe me then if you say then i am ready to comment here without logging in so that my IP will be visible and thenjust match my IP with anyone you think who's in your view is a sockTejas MRCA (talk) 16:17, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your edits to the talk page were clearly POV pushing. PhilKnight (talk) 19:51, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

June 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Indian Army has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Indian Army was changed by Tejas MRCA (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.891373 on 2015-06-30T11:59:59+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:00, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was just reverting vandalism by user Mntzzr 70Days ago on Indian Army Tejas MRCA (talk) 12:24, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tejas MRCA, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Tejas MRCA! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! ChamithN (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:26, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. lTopGunl (talk) 12:58, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Tejas MRCA! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Human3015 knock knock • 15:29, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:38, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I Appeal this block and Request Administrators to UnBlockMe

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tejas MRCA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@ PhilKnight (talk) Sir Only Because of this You Blocked me Indefinitely Just in Two Edits on Talk:Kargil War you find me Pushing POV and Not any other One, Just see the Edit History of Talk:Kargil War and see how many Socks Belonging to Pakistani Accounts are Pushing POV And By Your View, According to WP:POV An Editor is Said to be Pushing POV when he is Pushing his point of view without any source And just check my contributions not even a single claim I have commented on Talk:Kargil War without sources. I mentioned Numerous Neutral Sources For Decisive Indian Victory on RFC - Talk Page @Kargil War InfoBox. And I see No Reason of why I have been blocked. Is this is just because I Participated In the RFC @Talk:Kargil War and Presented My Claim With Numerous Sources? This is tottaly Wrong, I didn't Violated not even a Single Wikipedia Policies Still I am Blocked Indefinitely.

I Strongly Appeal This Block And Request Administrators to Unblock Me Tejas MRCA (talk) 07:21, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 14:10, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reviewing admins: please note that this unblock request is so similar to that of KnightWarrior25 (talk · contribs) they are almost certainly the same person. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:49, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]