User talk:Tejas.B

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as: copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such unreasonable information or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, and will result in your account being blocked.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. Again, welcome! -- ImpuMozhi 14:18, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Indian Beauties

I've nominated Indian Beauties, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Indian Beauties satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Beauties and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Indian Beauties during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.Suncloud 23:34, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation

Explanation. May be the title Indian Beauties wasn't an apt one, but the content of the article is what that matters. Beauty is something rare that is not possessed by anyone. We should try to admire people who represent the beauty of our country on an international platform. This article was only created so as to remind that India is not just a land of snake charmers, but as beautiful as any other country in the world. The content has been presented in a critical point of view, and not vaguely. It does not direct towards racism, vulgarity and any other anti-social elements. So, I would thank everyone for atleast having a glance through my article inspite of my so called 'useless' efforts. Sorry if I had hurt anyone's feelings. —Tejas.B 19:22, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Oh! Wikipedia is so great that it has got nothing to do with other's feelings. Do as you wish. I created the article and wrote a jist of the biographies of various beauty pageant winners. But you just modified, twisted, turned it without even consulting my opinion. Delete all the writings contributed by me. Yes, you can do anything because I cannot do anything since I am just a poor user. Truly the world is a deceiving place. All made detrimental comments on me saying that I was completely unencyclopediac. I'll see how your new will stand in the sands of time.

Can anyone just direct me the way to resign membership from the GREAT Wikipedia.

re List of Indian beauty pageant winners

What is your objection to this article? Herostratus 05:34, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop erasing that article, OK? Sheesh. Herostratus 23:12, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Planetary size

Hi, I edited this article in an effort to increase its chances of passing it's AfD as the nom objected to the style of the writing. If you can add some more sources to it, or hard facts, that would be great. Nick mallory 07:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Earth, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. "[It is the only planet that does not contain life]" That true? Prove it :) — Shinhan < talk > 13:00, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation

I'm really sorry for my silly gesture. It was a editing error which happened by sheer coincidence. It should have been actually as It is the only planet that contains life. Anyways, sorry for that and I hope to provide more informative articles for the constructive extension of Wikipedia in all walks of life.

Featured articles

Hi - There's actually a fairly involved process for getting articles listed at WP:FA, please see WP:FAC. I've undone your addition of Planetary-size comparison. -- Rick Block (talk) 16:53, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits of Katrina Kaif

Your edits to the article on Katrina Kaif have resulted in the article becoming unsuitable for Wikipedia. Much of the material is of tabloid and page 3 nature, and many of the references are non-credible. Please understand what a wikipedia article is meant to be like before making any further edits. An encyclopedia article is NOT a newspaper article. Achitnis (talk) 18:20, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that I have removed most of your edits from this article, as almost everything was non-encyclopedic, unreferenced, referenced by non-credible sources, or written in a style that is unsuitable for wikipedia (mostly written in a gushy, PR-style fanbiy manner, ore suited for a fim magazine, not for an encyclopedia. Please do not add more material to the article unless you have discussed this on the article's talk page. Achitnis (talk) 09:34, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While your intentions may be good, your execution remains flawed. Your current edits of the article mostly add no additional information (and just duplicate what is already said), represent original research and your own opinions (you speak in a judgemental and editorial style), refers to non-credible sources (often flimy magazines known for their sensationalism and stretching of the truth), etc. This has resulted in an article that reads like a film magazine article, instead of a collection of facts. You also attempt to interpret "facts" you have gathered, which is another no-no (that is original research). And it has caused the article itself to become sloppy and unreadable.

You seem to be particularly attached to this article, or rather, the subject, and that is unfortunately showing in your writing. You are too carried away with the subject. I would suggest that you don't attempt to write about filmy subjects, since your other edits on non-filmy articles tend to be a lot better. Achitnis (talk) 16:16, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kachiguda Railway Station

With reference to your additions to this article, I've reverted your changes because the infobox is not quite appropriate to the article page. Typical additions could be similar to what is there for the New York City Subway. Hope this helps. Mspraveen (talk) 15:51, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding "Big"

Please stop changing alternate language scripts to big, it's not right per our manual of style. —SpacemanSpiff 08:11, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of CineMAA Award for Best Actress (Jury)

The article CineMAA Award for Best Actress (Jury) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that this article has notability independent of the parent article, CineMAA Awards.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:44, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Boiyakonda Gangamma Temple

An article that you have been involved in editing—Boiyakonda Gangamma Temple —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. agasthya 04:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agasthyathepirate (talk • contribs)

Nomination of Trains of South Central Railway (India) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trains of South Central Railway (India) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trains of South Central Railway (India) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 12:48, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Indians who won international beauty pageants

The article List of Indians who won international beauty pageants has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article duplicates the the individual articles such as Femina Miss India, Miss Earth India etc. The string of pageants are not notable and failed to satisfy the notability guidelines. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent third party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 13:33, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Indians who won international beauty pageants

The article List of Indians who won international beauty pageants has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a duplication list to include non-notable contestants to non-notable pageants. Indonesia's representatives to notable pageants were already listed in the yearly editions of Miss Universe Miss World, Miss Earth, Miss International. Likewise, the national winners and representatives were also listed in the Miss Femina India, Miss Earth India, Miss Diva, Miss India Worldwide articles, and etc. Notable pageants for men have also another lists like the Mister International India, and etc. This article is just an expanded list to include non-notable pageant contestants without sources. Also, see List of beauty pageants.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 23:51, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Indians who won international beauty pageants for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Indians who won international beauty pageants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Indians who won international beauty pageants until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Richie Campbell (talk) 23:52, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tejas.B. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tejas.B. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]