User talk:Teilhardo

Welcome!

Welcome...

Hello, Teilhardo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Jack (talk) 11:26, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome: the Sequel

Hey Teilhardo! Saw your edit to concussion, thanks much for the addition. If you're interested in head injury, feel free to stop by traumatic brain injury, we're working on fixing it up for a possible far-off FAC bid. If you ever need any help with Wikipedia matters, feel free to leave me a note on my talk page. Hope to see you around and work with you! Peace, delldot ∇. 01:20, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User contributions

Not sure if you already know but you (and everybody else) can see all your edits here including what changes were made. Cheers, Jack (talk) 11:25, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re

I noticed that another user was doing the same thing and it prompted me to keep somewhat of a log in an easy to read format. --Teilhardo (talk) 17:57, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, just a suggestion. Cheers, Jack (talk) 18:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Environmental Engineering Science

Just wanted to say thank you for the work on the Environmental Engineering Science page. I am a 3rd year UCB EES major, and this is a great and very useful page to have on the interwebs. I'm guessing you've graduated already (born 1986), which means you were one of the first graduates with a degree in EES. Any advice for my last few years in the program? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.212.1.58 (talk) 23:11, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your email re: SGI

Hey, thanks for getting in touch by email, sorry for the delayed reply. You've certainly put plenty of quality work into it. I have not been as active on WP in the past couple weeks. What were you thinking I should do to help? I'll watchlist this page so you can reply here, also you can get my attention on any page by linking to my username. delldot ∇. 03:39, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ∇.. Thanks for your renewed activity on behalf of my naivete! Actually, writing this article has inspired me to learn more about all the new additions and functionality in the last several years. It is quite amazing progress and your continued tenacity to keep this project sustained is incredible. As for the SGI article, I was hoping that you might be able to help me traverse a way to improve upon it in a way that is fit for Wikipedia purposes (ie a way to keep the public accurately informed about the company and what it does). I wrote the draft (as I mentioned) but I really don't know of anything else I should (can) be doing to get the requested edit made. Any information that you might be able to offer as to the proper protocol for this type of improvement would be helpful and very much appreciated!

Thanks, Teilhardo (talk) 08:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well I think your best bet is to make it as easy as possible for whoever's going to do it. If someone's gotta read the entire suggested article, vet each source, check each sentence for accuracy against the source, decide whether the whole thing is neutral on the balance, and so on, that's probably going to be a daunting task and you'll be waiting a while. The pain of working with an all-volunteer project! So I'd recommend doing it sentence by sentence. The easier you make it the faster it will probably go, so I'd do something like this: "Here's what it says now, (or fails to say), and why that's wrong. Here's the accurate info. This is my suggested addition. Here's a link to the article it's sourced from. It meets WP:reliable sources because ___. (If that's not obvious, e.g. a scientific journal wouldn't need that but an obscure web news site might). On the other hand you don't want to make it TL;DR either. I'm happy to help with this some but I also don't want to dedicate hours and hours to it, just to be real. Hope this helps! delldot ∇. 06:15, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Teilhardo. You have new messages at Talk:Synthetic Genomics.
Message added 04:59, 5 March 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Altamel (talk) 04:59, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Teilhardo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]