User talk:Tehshakur

Welcome!

Hello, Tehshakur, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Tehshakur/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 12:52, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Tehshakur/sandbox

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Tehshakur/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 12:52, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Advert and COI warnings

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Hello, Tehshakur. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 13:38, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Deb (talk) 17:33, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tehshakur (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

New editor didn't RTFM completely and broke a rule. Will complete training before retrying my article

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:04, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Tehshakur (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account was banned indefinitely from editing because my submission made it appear that my account was being used for advertising or promotion. That is not my intent but after extensive reading of the appropriate guides on WP as well as on other sources I believe I understand what I did wrong. I am committed to providing excellent content to Wikipedia incompliance with the organization's policies. I will not intentionally damage or disrupt Wikipedia. My initial draft did not prove/demonstrate notability of the subject and it appeared to be original research as opposed to material that has been collected and organized from reliable sources. My offline draft now contains short and full citations and would be characterized as both Primary and Secondary reliable/reputable sources. I have included examples at the end of this post. My work is in IT/Cloud but I have a lifetime interest in medicine, especially orthopedic and maxilofacial surgery. I learned about the Craniofacial Distraction technique that Dr. McCarthy teaches and I feel that I could make a constructuve contribution to Wikipedia by editing, enhancing, and contributing content related to this field of research. In addition I am a Vespa Scooter collector and look forward to working on content in that area as well. For example the Vespa page lists many Vespa models but few of those model names have subpages summarizing and differentiating them. I am qualified to do the research and produce edits in that area. I hope this explanation is sufficient for approving this unblock request. Thank you Example citiations for my article: Simultaneous Le Fort III and Le Fort I Osteotomy: Surgical Outcomes and Clinical Parameters. Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2023:34(1):222-226. Longitudinal Skeletal Growth Analysis of Mandibular Asymmetry in Unoperated Patients With Unilateral Craniofacial Microsomia (UCFM). Cleft palate-craniofacial journal. 2021. Correction of Severe Facial Asymmetry in Patients With Unilateral Craniofacial Microsomia Using Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing Technology: An Evaluation of Postsurgical Results. Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2021:32(7):2416-2420. Maxillomandibular and occlusal relationships in preadolescent patients with syndromic craniosynostosis treated by LeFort III distraction osteogenesis: 10-year surgical and phenotypic stability. American journal of orthodontics & dentofacial orthopedics. 2019:156(6):779-790. Eruption of Maxillary Posterior Permanent Molars following Early Conventional Le Fort III Advancement and Early Le Fort III Distraction Procedures Compared to Late Surgical Intervention. Plastic & reconstructive surgery. 2019:143(3):565e-571e. Proptosis Correction in Pre-Adolescent Patients With Syndromic Craniosynostosis by Le Fort III Distraction Osteogenesis. Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2018:29(6):1535-1541. Unusual Craniofacial Distraction. Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2018:29(3):698-702. Five Year Follow-Up of Midface Distraction in Growing Children with Syndromic Craniosynostosis. Plastic & reconstructive surgery. 2017:140(6):794e-803e. Tehshakur (talk) 20:13, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I have reviewed this good block and determined that you have met the requirements set for its lifting, with the caveat that — if you decide to submit to mainspace the article draft on which you were working that precipitated this block — you submit it via the WP:AFC process and do not introduce it directly. Failure to do so may or may not result in a reapplication of the block. Thank you for your interest in Wikipedia! Chetsford (talk) 23:22, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Tehshakur (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Administrators. I am so confused. It looked like Chetsford unblocked me but when I came back to learn more WP editing and went to edit a suggested article for grammar I was blocked by Deb's Block issued this summer. Please advise what I should do? (I will continue looking around in help pages to see if I can figure it out) I am committed to reading all the manuals and being a good editor. Thank you for your timeTehshakur (talk) 19:56, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Sorry, I forgot to actually do the unblock! Should be fixed now. Chetsford (talk) 20:52, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, thank you very much! Tehshakur (talk) 21:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]