User talk:Teddyfl

This is Teddyfl's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Open Charge Point Interface (November 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://wevo.energy/white-papers/ocpi/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Open Charge Point Interface may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:51, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Teddyfl! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 06:51, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 10:21, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deb, what exactly is promotional about my article? It is reviewing a open technology and does not reference or promote any specific technology. Can you please state what is not objective in the article or what you consider promotional content? Teddyfl (talk) 10:27, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I meant it does not promote any specific implementation or vendor. Teddyfl (talk) 10:28, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen this purely by chance. Asking a question on your own Talk page is not how you alert another user. The problem is that we don't want a "review" or a personal opinion, we want an article that meets Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. But let's say I accept that this technology is "the most popular", though Google Trends can't be used to support that statement. So we go on to the first paragraph of the section headed "OCPI Overview". You've included an external link within the text - that's one problem (see Wikipedia:External links). "Everyone can join the EV Roaming Foundation, by signing and returning the EVRoaming Contributor Agreement": if that's not an invitation to join, I don't know what is. In fact, the whole section and the rest of the article is a summary of the advantages of this technology. If you read through it after consulting the Wikipedia guidelines, you should be able to recognise the issues. If you still can't, I would recommend that you don't try to create any new articles until you've had more practice at simple editing.

If you feel you can't accept my reply, I'd suggest asking the questions at Wikipedia:Teahouse. Deb (talk) 14:13, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Open Charge Point Interface (OCPI) Protocol (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the sources are reliable and/or independent and much of the content is unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Open Charge Point Interface (OCPI) Protocol and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 16:05, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Open Charge Point Interface

Hello, Teddyfl. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Open Charge Point Interface, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:34, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Open Charge Point Interface

Hello, Teddyfl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Open Charge Point Interface".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:19, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]