User talk:Ted Newsom

Welcome!

Hello, Ted Newsom, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Michaelas10 18:26, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Supe and lucy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Supe and lucy.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:09, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Superman trivia

I added the part about Hugh Beaumont to the blurb about "Leave it to Beaver", but that was taking on faith that whoever added the part about "Beaver" knew what he was talking about, which as I think about it seems unlikely. The buildings used on "Superman" and "Andy Griffith" have been documented. I don't know about "Beaver". Wahkeenah 19:33, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding "trivia" in general, beware of a certain user who is going around haughtily proclaiming that "encyclopedias don't have trivia" and zapping such. He has done this to me directly at least twice. Once was in The Sting. As a safeguard, you might consider renaming "trivia" to "notes" or some such. Wahkeenah 19:33, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Naked Monster

Well it took my a little while to figure out what you'd done there, but I think you'll be happy with the result :) Glen 17:51, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BRILLIANT! Thanx, Glen!

Ted Newsom 04:23, 2 November 2007 (UTC)== Spider-Man film series ==[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Spider-Man film series, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you.

You might also want to read WP:COI and WP:LIVING, if you are the Ted Newsom that this article is discussing, as there are certain things one must know when editing articles about themselves. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 04:40, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Contact me" takes you to my talk page, if you want to send me an email--which I advice against, only because it is not the fastest way to get in-touch with me--then you have to go to my user page and click the link there. Is there something I may help you with? BIGNOLE (Contact me) 20:39, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to give you the oppurtunity to correct this before I revert the whole mess. You have 4 sources with errors that need to be corrected (see "References" section for which ones). Then you have 5 more sources that have incomplete templates that need to be filled out. From there, you have several paragraphs without a single citation, and a couple of partial paragraphs--i.e. there's no citation for the last half of the paragaph, but one for the first couple sentences--with no sources. You have a couple stray sentences with no sources. Everything must have a source, and that means more than saying "According to Company X", you need to actually have something we can verify. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 18:05, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since the original material was replete with factual errors in every sentence, and citations which were at best fourth hand (the Business Week stuff, for instance), I think the section is improving. Many thanks for the courtesy of allowing me to correct the citation problems before you revert everything to 2000 words of misinformation again. Give me a hand, if you will, regarding the specifics you're arguing-- I'm not quite wiki-hip enough to know where you're pointing. I still have the books, magazines and articles on hand and will gladly footnote every sentence if necessary. However, if there are, say, 3 or 4 sentences that ALL come from the same source, I do think it's kind of silly to place the same footnote after each period. I do think the long saga of the development of the movie will be interesting to anyone who has never been in the middle of the process. That, and there are a lot of Spidey fans who can't get enough esoterica.

And please bear in mind, the chronologic and simply factual errors that were in the previous version may well have been properly cited-- but the cited sources were wrong, and far removed from the primary sources. And by wikipedia rules, primary sources (in this case, published quotes directly from the persons involved) ace out 4th hand speculation by Business Week writers who are knowledgable in some other field. Let's just make this the best wikipedia entry in history, that's all. Ted Newsom 04:23, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And we tidy it all up

One example is: "<ref name="Leva">{{cite news | author=Pat Jankiewicz | title=Scott Leva, The Man Who Was Almost Spider-Man| publisher=Starlog/Comics Scene presents Spider-Man #1 | date=July 2002 | Other performers discussed were [[Lauren Bacall]] or [[Katherine Hepburn]] as [[Aunt May, [[Adolph Caesar]] as a detective, and [Peter Cushing]] as a sympathetic scientist.</ref> <ref name="Newsom"/>" --If you are citing a journal, then use Template:Cite journal, this goes for magazines as well, as both have volume and issue numbers. Another important thing in that example is that you have text in the reference. I don't know what it is supposed to be used for, it certainly doesn't appear on the screen. This "Newsom" reference appears twice in the article, neither time with an actual source. Are you trying to cite yourself? We've discussed that before, you cannot do that, because we--as in Wikipedia--cannot verify your experiences simply by your word. We need published sources, something that can actually be verified.

Some references appear to just not be closed. You began your template with "{{", so you have to make sure you always end with "}}" to close it off. Some of the things I can fix, others I cannot because I don't have the rest of the source information. As for citing every sentence. If you have an entire paragraph coming from one source then it only needs to be cited at the end of that paragraph. If you have an entire section coming from one source, then cite "each" paragraph in the section. Don't cite each sentence if it's the same source. What I saw was the first couple sentences in a paragraph with a source, but the remaining portion was uncited. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 23:47, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, who are you citing when you quote "Ted Newsom and .... also wrote a script...not a good script.."? It would be good to attribute a name to that quote. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 23:49, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The comment on the various drafts (I thought) was pretty clear: Scott Leva, who was up for the role, read all the drafts, etc., in "Spider-Man & Other Comics Heroes #1"; publisher, Starlog Group Inc., ISBN #0-88013-048-2), July, 2002, p64. The other cite from this source refers to casting, on p65; reference to Superman IV and Masters of the Universe on p64. The Superman/Masters explanation is repeated in "David Anthony Kraft's Comics Interview" #85, author: Daniel Patrick O'Neill, publisher: Fictioneer Books Inc., NYC; date: March, 1990; article title "Writer Ted Newsom," p13-15. (If it will add an air of versimilitude, this issue is referenced on line in the Michigan State University Libraries Comic Art Collection at http://www.lib.msu.edu/comics/rri/srri/spider1.htm

Stan Lee quote is from the same issue. Author=Dan Hagen | Comics Interview Magazine #85 | title=Publisher Stan Lee Speaks | publisher=Fictioneer Books Ltd. | date=March 1990. Quote is on p84

Ref. to Neil Ruttenberg's material is in Gross, pp202-204; also on page 20, "Creative Screenwriting" magazine, Vol. 9, #3; author=Steve Ryfle; title=Spider-Man's Tangled Web"; publisher=CS Publications, Inc., LA, CA.

Reference to Cameron's delivery of the screenplay to Carolco was in Variety, Sept. 1, 1993, page 3.

Reference to Golan's 21st Century reverting to the "Doc Ock" screenplay is a full-page ad in Variety, May 5, 1989, the Cannes Film Festival Issue; it says "Based on the characters created by Stan Lee; Written by Barney Cohen, Ted Newsom & John Brancato and Joseph Goldman; Produced by Menahem Golan." (There's an optimisitic corner banner-snipe, "Principal Photography begins September 1989"). This ad also appeared in the H'wd Reporter the same day.

Second ad reference to the 21st Century project is a full page ad in Variety (and the H'wd Reporter), dated Feb 20, 1990, lising "Executive Producers Stan Lee and Joseph Calimari; Screenplay by Neil Ruttenberg and Joseph Goldman" and adds (Credits Not Contractual).

Baseline II Inc. in 1995 listed "Spiderman (film) Aka: Spider-Man. Genre: fantasy adventure adaptation action." Carolco, Lightstorm and 21st Century are all listed as contacts, with phone numbers; producers are "Cameron (DIR), James; Lee, Stan, executive producer; Calamari, Joseph, executive producer; CREDITS: Cameron (DIR) James, screenplay; Ruttenberg, Neil, screenplay; Lee, Stan, executive consultant. CAST: Arnold Schwarzenegger has been mentioned for the role of Dr. Octopus. BUDGET-ESTIMATE: $60,000,000." Oddly enough, Neil's name also appears on the credit list on spidermanhype.com/spidercast.htm, accessed on May 30, 2001 ("Writing Credits: David Koepp, Neil Ruttenberg, Scott Rosenberg, Alvin Sergent.")

On-line references to Schwarzenegger & Doc Ock are at:

http://www.hollywood.com/news/Who_Is_SpiderMan/311891

http://www.realmovietrivia.com/page_xmen.html

http://www.cracked.com/article_15072_p2.html

http://www.retrojunk.com/details_articles/664

(and a boatload of other places.)

The 007/Spidey showdown & resolution is dealt with at

http://www.mi6.co.uk/sections/articles/sony_past_007_attempts.php3?s=articles&t= & http://www.mi6.co.uk/sections/articles/obituary_kevin_mcclory.php3 &

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117871343.html?categoryid=1343&cs=1&query=Kirsten+Dunst%2C+%22kirsten+dunst%22

-- again, among other places. New West magazine also covered it in a piece on John Calley and a UK magazine called Empire did a pretty good job on the story, but all I can recall is that the issue came out in 2003 or 2004, after the release of the film (don't have either of these available, which is why they're not cited)

Ed Gross' book covered much of the behind the scenes stuff and details several of the plot variations in the 1984-2000 time frame. In case my wikipedia-formatting skills are not up to snuff, the info on this is "Author=Edward Gross; title=Spider-Man Confidential, from Comic Icon to Hollywood Hero; publsher=Hyperion (NYC); date=2002; ISBN=0-7868-8722-2. (Development & scripts are covered from pp183-209; pp210-237 covers the Raimi production).

Material in one of the citations ("Other performers discussed were Lauren Bacall or Katherine Hepburn as [[Aunt May, Adolph Caesar as a detective, and [Peter Cushing]] as a sympathetic scientist.") should properly come IN the paragraph regarding casting, rather than in the cited footnote for it. I don't know how I stuck it there. Cite on that is Comics Interview/Newsom (as above) p8-14, and in Gross, p189

Regarding citing "myself"-- in this case, I'm going by you guys' suggestions and I think it's staying within the understandable guidelines. The lengthy interviews with Stan Lee & me in Comics Interview, the Hiltzik piece in the LA Times, Steve Ryfle's cited articles (published, and on-line) and Ed Gross's book put "me" at a one-step remove from this, and in pretty good company. Plus, the authors of the latter two works put their material together not from one source, but dozens, and all directly involved. As published works from established authors, I think they meet the criteria of w/p. I hope so, anyway.

I don't want to burden you with sweeping up after me, B.N., but you're clearly a LOT better at formatting than y'rs tr'ly. I'm willing to put in more drudge work to footnote this properly... but I may need an expert hand. Let's just make the article the best one any Wikipedia cruiser has ever seen. Ted Newsom 01:51, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the templates you need to look at are Template:Cite news, Template:Cite book, Template:Cite journal and Template:Cite web. Any magazines are considered journals, and I'd look at those templates to see what is mandatory information in order to make the template work on the page. If you have urls then add those. They don't have to be the primary source of the citation, but a second option to verifying the text. The problem with the quote I pulled out was that you started a sentence that was an exact quote, without identifying the author of the quote. If Scott Leva is the quoted person, then the statement should be: "Scott Leva stated that 'Ted Newsom and John Brancato had written the script. It was good but it needed a little work. Unfortunately, with every subsequent rewrite by other writers, it went from good to bad to terrible.'" --- or "According to Scott Leva." BIGNOLE (Contact me) 02:19, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Naked monster key art 4 wiki.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Naked monster key art 4 wiki.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:08, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm hoping this will do, but I'm unsure where to put this information:

Non-free media information and use rationale true for The Naked Monster
Description	dvd cover art
Source	scanned at home with permission of copyright holder
Article	The Naked Monster
Portion used	100% of art at 20% reduction of original
Low resolution?	yes jpeg
Purpose of use	identifiability of film
Replaceable?	none
Other information	posted by copyright owner of the film itself
Fair useFair use of copyrighted material in the context of The Naked Monster//wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Ted_Newsomtrue

Ted Newsom (talk) 05:51, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Wikipedia 56 tn jpeg.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Wikipedia 56 tn jpeg.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:06, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Ted Newsom! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 4 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Stuart Galbraith IV - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:28, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Naked Monster for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Naked Monster is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Naked Monster until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:12, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ted Newsom wikipedia photo.JPG

A tag has been placed on File:Ted Newsom wikipedia photo.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:17, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Steve Calvert, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages House of Wax and The Adventures of Superman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Spider-Man (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barney Cohen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Whole Lotta Rosies (band).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Aaron Booth (talk) 02:45, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Whole Lotta Rosies (band).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 04:31, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Ted Newsom. You have new messages at DoriSmith's talk page.
Message added 19:55, 27 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 19:55, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Whole Lotta Rosies (band) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Whole Lotta Rosies (band), a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 07:41, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Whole Lotta Rosies (band)

Hello Ted Newsom. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Whole Lotta Rosies (band).

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Whole Lotta Rosies (band)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Brinke stevens in 2005.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:18, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jack Pierce (makeup artist), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages House of Frankenstein, The Indestructible Man and You Are There. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ted Newsom. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Whole Lotta Rosies (band) (July 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Whole Lotta Rosies (band) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 14:04, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Ted Newsom, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DrStrauss talk 14:04, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Whole Lotta Rosies (band) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Whole Lotta Rosies (band), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ted Newsom. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Son of Dracula (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Whole Lotta Rosies (band) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Whole Lotta Rosies (band), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Whole Lotta Rosies (band)

Hello, Ted Newsom. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Whole Lotta Rosies".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 07:06, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ted Newsom. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Stuart G n Donald Ritchie.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Stuart G n Donald Ritchie.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 18:55, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Ted Newsom photo for Wikipedia 1.JPG

The file File:Ted Newsom photo for Wikipedia 1.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Ken Tobey with Margaret Sherrdan (1951) and Brinke Stevens(1984).jpg

The file File:Ken Tobey with Margaret Sherrdan (1951) and Brinke Stevens(1984).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]