User talk:Ted.strauss

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Ted.strauss! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- Netsnipe ^(Talk) 16:26, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Bbqtime

Hi, please note that Wikipedia is not a free host, blog, webspace provider or social networking site. Thanks, Netsnipe ^(Talk)

Deleted page

Please indicate which page you're talking about. --Fang Aili ^talk 16:34, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Torono-island.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Torono-island.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:04, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trace

Thank you for writing the Trace (psycholinguistics) article for Wikipedia. While many non-specialists edit Wikipedia, contributions from a published authority on a topic are obviously particularly welcome. I've removed the templates that were indicating problems, since the users adding them hadn't made it clear what exactly was wrong with the article or how it could be improved. The article looks very useful to me as it is. EALacey (talk) 11:05, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A little quibble

Ted Strauss, thanks for a most informative and well-written article; it taught me lots! But I do have a small quibble (quibblet?) over the phrasing "It is widely accepted ...". Please have a look at: Talk:Trace_(psycholinguistics)#Accepted_or_postulated.3F on the article's Talk page. Thanks!

yoyo (talk) 17:58, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Diane Reidy

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Diane Reidy, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Diane reidy. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 06:41, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Diane Reidy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diane Reidy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diane Reidy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GabrielF (talk) 17:41, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diane Reidy

Please see. Bearian (talk) 20:43, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

While the community decided that an article on this individual is inappropriate for Wikipedia, it might be possible to mention the events in the main article on the shutdown. I say posible because I'm really not clear on what lasting significance the outburst had or has on any of the events. Given the concerns expressed about Biography of Living Persons coverage, I don't think including her name in that article will be allowed. This is a response to your post on the deletion discussion page. Take care. Candleabracadabra (talk) 13:41, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]