User talk:Teardroprain

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that in your recent comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Kacher you wrote "We have also consulted with our attorneys at Reed Smith and are prepared to take this to a higher level if necessary". I am not sure whether you had in mind here possible legal action against the Wikimedia foundation or against another party. Can you please clarify this? It is important to be clear as to whether you intended to suggest possible legal action against Wikimedia, in light of Wikipedia's legal threats policy. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:41, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you have posted three copies of your comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Kacher on my talk page. At first I thought this was a slip due to lack of experience in editing Wikipedia, perhaps inadvertently saving the same edit repeatedly. but looking more closely I found that your three postings were spread over a period of 55 minutes, and I find it difficult to see this as an error. I do not know what your purpose was in making these multiple postings, but please do not do so again. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:54, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that in your recent comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Kacher you wrote "We have also consulted with our attorneys at Reed Smith and are prepared to take this to a higher level if necessary". I am not sure whether you had in mind here possible legal action against the Wikimedia foundation or against another party. Can you please clarify this? It is important to be clear as to whether you intended to suggest possible legal action against Wikimedia, in light of Wikipedia's legal threats policy. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:41, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

This is not against Wikimedia or Wikipedia as I think they are brilliant examples of open source. No other site has grown as fast from the diligence of people who wish to share knowledge.

I notice that you have posted three copies of your comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Kacher on my talk page. At first I thought this was a slip due to lack of experience in editing Wikipedia, perhaps inadvertently saving the same edit repeatedly. but looking more closely I found that your three postings were spread over a period of 55 minutes, and I find it difficult to see this as an error. I do not know what your purpose was in making these multiple postings, but please do not do so again. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:54, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

My apologies, James. It was my own lack of experience in editing on Wikipedia. I wrote out quite a bit, so wanted to save it to prevent accidental loss. I did this three times. I didnt realize it would save a newer copy to your page each time. What is the next step in this debate? I am unfamiliar with the mechanics of Wikipedia. I have no problem providing links as I have done, or documents to supplement the claims others have placed on the page. You may notice that there was a debate back in 2007 that I was two different people, but somehow it was settled.

Thank you, Chris Kacher christian.geographia@gmail.com Teardroprain (talk) 17:07, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]