User talk:Teamantime

Wikipedia does not count as a reliable source

Better editing today but I must point out that Wikipedia does not count as a reliable source. Check it out. --Simon D M (talk) 19:03, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits to Sahaja Yoga

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Teamantime! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bvids\.myspace\.com\b, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! AntiSpamBot (talk) 03:34, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 18:08, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for 24 hours for edit warring at Sahaja Yoga. In the future, when in content disputes, please discuss your edits on the talk page and seek consensus. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Should you wish to contest your block, you may add {{unblock|reason}} to your talk page. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 06:14, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Language

Hello, Teamantime, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV), and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me my talk page. Again, welcome! ·:· Will Beback ·:· 07:11, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plaese stop removing sourced, neutral information. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 07:56, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Sahaja Yoga appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you--Simon D M (talk) 13:15, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace neutral wording with POV wording in Wikipedia articles, as you did to Sahaja Yoga. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. You have been repeatedly replacing neutral wording with POV wording.--Simon D M (talk) 18:27, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by replacing neutral wording with POV wording in articles, as you did to Sahaja Yoga, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You are showing no respect for WP policy. --Simon D M 19:02, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning for Inappropriate Use of Minor Edit Box

Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Sahaja Yoga, as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one (and vice versa) is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. --Simon D M (talk) 14:16, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are still misusing the minor edit box. --Simon D M (talk) 15:20, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning template abuse by Simon D M

It is pretty obvious that the above templates are solely intended to harass this new editor. Simon D M did the same thing to my talk page - pathetic behaviour. Sfacets 11:38, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Sahaja Yoga. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Simon D M (talk) 14:51, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sahaja Yoga, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. If there is some reason why you think the Coney article is inappropriate, please come to the Talk page and explain yourself. --Simon D M (talk) 15:19, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Sahaja Yoga, you will be blocked from editing. Alexfusco5 02:33, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]