User talk:Tbmorgan74

Hello Brent,

On List of science fiction conventions you asked,

It would be perfect if it were a table with colums you could sort by, name, city, state, month. Can that be done? --Tbmorgan74 14:22, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

I did not think such could be supported, but I found partial support; see How_to_sort_tables. However, not all information is suitable for a table; see When_tables_are_inappropriate.

In addition, all lists of SciFi convenations seem to get dated rather quickly. However, for the Southern U.S., this seems well maintained.

Wendell 12:44, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that was you when I saw your name come up somewhere. But I wasnt sure until I read your reference to GO and THAAD! I will go browse your contributions.

See you around!

Discworld reading order

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Discworld reading order, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Discworld reading order. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. (aeropagitica) 21:39, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Apolloconlogo2007.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Apolloconlogo2007.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Merger of comic book conventions with science fiction conventions

Why did you do this when the consensus in the discussion was against it? --Orange Mike 21:23, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here's my proposed new lead paragraph for what was formerly List of science fiction conventions:

"This is a haphazard list of media fandom-bilking expositions, anime conventions, comic book shows, furry gatherings, a few science fiction conventions, and everything else remotely connected with imagination or "sci-fi" (but not necessarily with actual science fiction). Please be aware that many of these events (particularly those called "shows" or "expositions") are run for-profit for the benefit of the persons or corporation putting them together, and may have nothing to do with actual science fiction or science fiction fandom. You might as well go ahead and add more "conventions" as you find them; no quality control or evaluation has been exercised in compiling this list, since Wikipedia is an indiscriminate compilation of lists."

Obviously, too, you will need to pick a new name for the article, since the old name is false now. --Orange Mike 21:47, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for the infobox on MOBICON, That will really jump start efforts to get the page more wikified Defraggler 05:33, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Convergence logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Convergence logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:19, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Apolloconlogo2007.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Apolloconlogo2007.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:10, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Convergence logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Convergence logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 17:25, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Convergence logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Convergence logo.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:25, 16 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 17:25, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Apollocon 2004.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Apollocon 2004.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 13:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Dragoncon.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dragoncon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 13:39, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Gclogo.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Gclogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:09, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Icon convention logo.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Icon convention logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Hyperbanner.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Hyperbanner.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:31, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Oni mascots.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Oni mascots.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:36, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:TheMythopoeicSociety.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:TheMythopoeicSociety.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:39, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For your work on list of science fiction conventions

		The Oddball Barnstar
		for your thankless work on improving and clarifying the mess which is the list of science fiction conventions Orange Mike 19:21, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Honorverse

You seem to be the only major contributor of the series, so I'm hoping you can help me out. Fictional topics need real world information, such as development and reception notes from creators, writers, critics, fans and others based upon reliable sources in order to be a separate topic. Ones that don't have this information belong on lists or in the main article of the series. I have to imagine that out of all of those topics like characters, ships, and the other things on the template, some can achieve that information. But, any that cannot really need to be merged and/or redirected.

I imagine that you may not like the idea of that, but it goes with WP:V, WP:NOT (two policies of this site), WP:N, WP:RS (two of the more important guidelines), WP:FICT, and WP:WAF (two guidelines that directly relate to fiction). If you agree that merging and redirecting is a fine method, I would like to sort out which ones can possibly stay. If you disagree, please read over the above links, and I will try to explain why this is the best method. TTN 21:51, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As a contributor to many HH articles, I do agree with TTN that we have too many articles. Quite a few can be merged into existing lists, and we need a 'list of concepts' (List of Honorverse terminology?) for stuff like Neue-Stil Handgemenge (wow, I thought I was a major geek of HH but haven't recalled this... and I doubt more then few dozen people alive do :>). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 22:05, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed that the Honorverse was in a poor state previously. I have created the world of honorverse portal. I simply tried to document the articles that existed to know where we stand. The template matches the current articles as they exist now, and it reflects the poor organization. Improvements to the organization should be done, and then the template can be made to match the then existing organization. I am not in favor of wholesale deletion or redirections. Aggressive editors cherry pick those WP policies and cite them to their benefit, and to the detriment of others. (Not that you have done so TTN. That would look like "Article deleted per WP: Blah Blah) Don't be hasty. These articles have sat idle for 2 or more years without controversy. They need improvements, not deletions. I try to anticipate the needs of the audience. The general audience needs thoughtful well cited articles about the books them selves. Self selected fans of the material may want more indepth summaries of the cannon that spans 14 novels. Give both of them what they want while isolating them from each other by controlling the proliferation of links. Differentiate the in-universe data from the real world data. Cite real world data. In-universe data can be cited from the canonical novels, or not, they can just exist. In the same way that each and every pokeman species is throughly documented, but not exactly well cited outside of the creators published works. This is a fictional world, have fun with it. --Tbmorgan74 22:58, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lets move this conversation to the talkpage for honoverse Talk:Honorverse--Tbmorgan74 23:10, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

prod notification

James Bond gun barrel sequence/table test

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article James Bond gun barrel sequence/table test, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. JodyB_{yak, yak, yak} 20:47, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYI Honorverse

FYI, someone's been prodding a bunch of Honorverse articles.

Lille Comics Festival

Great thanks for the add (list of science fiction conventions). :-) Dorajor.

License tagging for Image:Con-troll-96 Convention Flyer.pdf

Thanks for uploading Image:Con-troll-96 Convention Flyer.pdf. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot (talk) 00:05, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discworld reading order

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Discworld reading order, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:44, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Discworld reading order

An editor has nominated Discworld reading order, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Discworld reading order and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Small, local, or niche genre conventions

An article that you have been involved in editing, Small, local, or niche genre conventions, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Small, local, or niche genre conventions. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Somno (talk) 01:54, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Honorverse articles

That which I feared has now happened. User:EEMIV has successfully pushed the merge of Imperial Andermani Navy‎ and now has

tagged Technology in the Honorverse and Weapons technology in the Honorverse with PROD’s;
blanked (that is, turned into redirects) Office of Frontier Security and State Security;
tagged for deletion (as AfD’s) Treecat, List of treecats and Honorverse concepts and terminology;
is about to do the same to Elysian Space Navy, Royal Manticoran Navy and probably others. Debresser (talk) 13:42, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Tbmorgan74/vincent

User:Tbmorgan74/vincent, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tbmorgan74/vincent and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Tbmorgan74/vincent during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. RL0919 (talk) 01:44, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Relaxacon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Relaxacon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.) that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GameInfirmary Talk 15:30, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]