User talk:Tazmaniacs

Hello, pleased to see you find interest in my talk page. Leave me a message if you want to, but do considerate that I do not engage in POV debates on my talk page, but on the relevant talk pages of each article. The reason for that is simple: the debate is not between me and you, but concerns all eventual readers of the article. If you have a genuine question on some matter, especially one in which I am interested into, or some real news to point me out which I surely have missed, I'll be pleased by your message. Have a nice time, enjoy Wikipedia!

I Abdullah Geelah hence present you the Editor's Barnstar for editing sentences that may offend others and plus this is my first ever barnstar award to someone so your this is very special! Thanks **Abdullah Geelah 15:18, 7 August 2006 (UTC)** [reply]

Barnstar of Diligence

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		Thanks very much for your wonderfully comprehensive answer to my question. It is fantastic to see that you are willing to put that much time and effort into answering the most minor of queries. Congratulations. Jmac 20:42, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Tazmaniacs, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Soothing R 17:14, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of films portraying paedophilia or sexual abuse of minors

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of films portraying paedophilia or sexual abuse of minors. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films portraying paedophilia or sexual abuse of minors. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ray Cappo

The article Ray Cappo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to find reliable sources of information about Cappo. All the ones I can find are about the bands rather than him. This article has been unsourced for almost 3 years.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 18:19, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Editions La Découverte listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Editions La Découverte. Since you had some involvement with the Editions La Découverte redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). TB (talk) 16:14, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Asking about a very old edit

Hi!

I was reading Appeal of June 18 and I wanted to ask about this edit: [1]. It seems surprising to me that the BBC didn't record this because they didn't deem it important enough, so I removed it pending confirmation. But, if true, and if there is a source for it, that's surely a very interesting anecdote. So I thought I'd pop by to ask if you know of a source for it.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 22:50, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Adolfo Kaminsky

On August 4, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Adolfo Kaminsky, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

undo deletions by media relations head at Clearstream

. . .

Greetings Tazmaniacs!

I have proposed to undo deletions made by the media relations head from Clearstream, see

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Clearstream#undo_deletions_by_media_relations_head_at_clearstream

Avaiki (talk) 01:46, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

. . . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avaiki (talk • contribs) 01:47, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Free rationale for File:LIP 29 September 1973.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:LIP 29 September 1973.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:37, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Free rationale for File:LIP libertaire.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:LIP libertaire.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:37, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Free rationale for File:LIP movie.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:LIP movie.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:37, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:US military bases in South America.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:US military bases in South America.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:09, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of Iraq War to the Algerian War

As a contributor to this article, you may be interested to know I have nominated it for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of Iraq War to the Algerian War. Robofish (talk) 23:52, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I requested userification of User:Geo Swan/Comparison of Iraq War to the Algerian War. I wondered whether if all the unreferenced paragraphs had been excised the article could have sailed through {{afd}}. Since you contributed to the article I thought I would invite you to take a look. Please feel free to offer an opinion on the advisability of restoration to article space on its talk page. Please feel free to edit the user space version.

The closing administrator, in their concluding statement, wrote: "It looks full of OR and, unless multiple works have been published doing an in-depth histiography of the subject, is not a viable encyclopedic article."

I don't understand why the closing administrator wrote we need "in-depth histiographies of the subject". Do you?

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 15:24, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Vichy resistance.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Vichy resistance.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:26, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Ezeiza2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ezeiza2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:22, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Former members of the French Communist Party

Category:Former members of the French Communist Party, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 16:49, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to Corruption in Argentina

Greetings Tazmaniacs, I noticed that you edit a lot of pages related to politics in Argentina. I spent the better part of the last two months creating the page for Corruption in Argentina, and I think it needs a fresh pair of eyes. Any chance you might be able to help? DaltonCastle (talk) 21:11, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JPTimbaud1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JPTimbaud1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Group of Eight (music)

The article Group of Eight (music) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article seems to be entirely WP:OR. There are no cited sources for tihs supposed 'group of eight'. Nor is there any such reference in major musical dictionaries such as Grove. All google references seem to derive from this article. I cannot find a single instance of any recognised musical authority using this term for this group.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Smerus (talk) 07:46, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish coins listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Spanish coins. Since you had some involvement with the Spanish coins redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Wishva de Silva | Talk 12:04, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Physiologies listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Physiologies. Since you had some involvement with the Physiologies redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Tom (LT) (talk) 04:06, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of United States Army installations in Italy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of United States Army installations in Italy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States Army installations in Italy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - || RuleTheWiki || (talk) 16:28, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kremlingate listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kremlingate. Since you had some involvement with the Kremlingate redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:27, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Democratic party USA) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Democratic party USA). Since you had some involvement with the Democratic party USA) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 09:27, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of YouTubers

There is another deletion discussion on List of YouTubers. If you would like to weigh in, you can do so by checking out the discussion here. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 04:54, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Scholars in France has been nominated for discussion

Category:Scholars in France, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 17:54, 3 September 2018 (UTC) [reply]

QUARTET ON THE MIDDLE EAST listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect QUARTET ON THE MIDDLE EAST. Since you had some involvement with the QUARTET ON THE MIDDLE EAST redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:28, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paladin mercenary group for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paladin mercenary group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paladin mercenary group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 15:03, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Sorry

I'm sorry I got mad at you a while back over Chilean articles.

CJK (talk) 22:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:El gas no se vende carajo.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:El gas no se vende carajo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 23:51, 1 December 2019 (UTC) [reply]

Notice of redirect discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion

"US Army intelligence" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect US Army intelligence. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 22#US Army intelligence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 12:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Anti-colonialist" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Anti-colonialist and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 18#Anti-colonialist until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 02:04, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Left-wing terrorism

Hi, I've listed Left-Wing terrorism in Articles for Deletion. You were involved previously when it was discussed and you may be interested. AlanS^talk 09:14, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]