User talk:Tatichat

Welcome!

Hello, Tatichat, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Jhinwar, have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can place {{helpme}} on your talk page along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorial
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Sitush (talk) 08:25, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Dhai Ghar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. utcursch | talk 16:52, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Jhinwar, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:53, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mehra (caste)

The article Mehra (caste) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG per talk page discussion. Also, left here it would include violations of WP:BLP, as would converting it to a redirect. Since I have now moved the list of people from here to Mehra, I will now blank the list here to avoid the BLP issue.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 10:07, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful

Restoring the article at Mehra (caste) is a breach of WP:CONSENSUS. Please read the comments at that article's talk page - see Talk:Mehra (caste) - and also the information below. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 16:56, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

Nomination of Mehra (caste) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mehra (caste) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mehra (caste) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sitush (talk) 17:00, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Hello, Tatichat, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Hindu knows (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 10:45, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

—SpacemanSpiff 10:45, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Mehra shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sitush (talk) 11:32, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Mehra that didn't seem very civil. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

You've got to stop suggesting that jealousy etc is some sort of motivation for what I am doing at various articles in which you are involved. I'm used to being attacked and so it doesn't bother me all that much but it is a bad habit to get into because it can land you in trouble. There are now at least two administrators watching what you are doing, so I suggest you tread lightly and try to take on board the points being made by others, some of whom (such as myself) do have a lot more experience than it would appear you do of what is and is not acceptable on Wikipedia. Sitush (talk) 12:09, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And why have you now removed this? I gave an explanation on the talk page and it is clear that you have seen it. - Sitush (talk) 12:12, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please provided highly reliable and peer reviewed articles about Mehra last name before suggesting that everything is a lie.Tatichat (talk) 12:13, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't said anything is a lie. I have, however, tried to explain why your phrasing is poor and that there appear to be other groups that have a claim to the name. For whatever the reason may be, you are choosing to ignore those points. - Sitush (talk) 12:26, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please give me a good reason why you should not be blocked

Tatichat, SpacemanSpiff warned you above about using multiple accounts, and he seemed to think you might not be aware of the policy against it. But your post here makes it clear that you did know about the policy, even before Spaceman's warning and before User:Hindu knows was blocked. You have ignored Spaceman's post above, and also mine here, so I'll ask you straight out: can you give me a good reason for not blocking you for knowingly violating Wikipedia's rules? Bishonen | talk 14:27, 17 April 2018 (UTC).[reply]

May 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Mehra (caste), you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 18:52, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mehra (caste), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 18:56, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

The only thing you've done since I asked my question above ("Please give me a good reason why you should not be blocked") is remove the Articles for deletion notice, which carries the clear warning "this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed". You haven't answered my question and my warning, but instead have continued to disrupt Wikipedia and ignore our rules. You have been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 19:04, 6 May 2018 (UTC).[reply]

{{unblock Hi its ok if I am blocked but as a creator of the "Mehra caste" page I would like it to be deleted. thanks

It has been deleted. Bishonen | talk 19:12, 6 May 2018 (UTC).[reply]